Who is online?
In total there are 16 users online :: 1 Registered, 0 Hidden and 15 Guests :: 2 Bots

Admin

[ View the whole list ]


Most users ever online was 111 on Thu 12 Dec 2013, 2:28 am
Latest topics
» WAR DRUMS
Today at 10:22 am by Admin

» R.D SOUZA Saved by faith
Yesterday at 9:17 pm by Admin

» THE MASTERS LIST Dean W. Masters
Yesterday at 9:14 pm by Admin

» HEAVEN LETTERS
Yesterday at 8:48 pm by Admin

» Meditation Chip Brogden
Yesterday at 8:46 pm by Admin

»  HONEST REPORTING Defending Israel from Media Bias plz read REGULAR UPDATES
Yesterday at 4:31 pm by Admin

» ENDTIME HEADLINES
Yesterday at 3:27 pm by Admin

» WORLD ISRAEL NEWS
Yesterday at 12:44 pm by Admin

» US says Western Wall to remain part of Israel
Yesterday at 11:31 am by Admin

» Daily Disciples
Yesterday at 10:18 am by Admin

» ISLAMISTS ACCUSE TRUMP OF 'FALSIFYING' HISTORY
Yesterday at 10:17 am by Admin

» Delrifkah: HEBREW SAGE MIGHT SAY.
Yesterday at 12:20 am by Admin

» NUGGET Today's Devotional
Yesterday at 12:12 am by Admin

» R.C. SPROUL, REFORMED THEOLOGIAN, DIES AT 78
Sat 16 Dec 2017, 10:59 pm by Admin

» FRANCIS FRANGIPANE MINISTRIES
Sat 16 Dec 2017, 12:32 am by Admin

» PROPHESY NEWS WATCH
Sat 16 Dec 2017, 12:26 am by Admin

» My Manna
Fri 15 Dec 2017, 11:57 pm by Admin

» +Dev+ Michael D. Inman
Fri 15 Dec 2017, 11:50 pm by Admin

» THE CLARION PROJECT
Fri 15 Dec 2017, 11:15 pm by Admin

»  Has the Zechariah 12 Battle Already Begun?
Fri 15 Dec 2017, 9:59 pm by Admin

Navigation
 Portal
 Index
 Memberlist
 Profile
 FAQ
 Search

ABOUT BENGHAZI

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: ABOUT BENGHAZI

Post  Admin on Sun 23 Oct 2016, 9:02 pm

[ltr]A SHORT POEM YOU WON'T FORGET[/ltr]
[ltr] Do you recall the President referring to the Benghazi incident as "a bump in the road?" [/ltr]
[ltr]Today I heard an ex-Navy Seal being interviewed on Fox News regarding a book he has written about how to handle crisis situations in our lives.[/ltr]


[ltr]At the end of the interview he asked if he could make a comment on Benghazi and, of course, the anchor said "yes."[/ltr]
[ltr] [/ltr]
[ltr]He then thanked Fox News for keeping the Benghazi story in the news, since other news organizations are not.[/ltr]
[ltr]He said the Seals who died deserve to be remembered by this poem.[/ltr]
[ltr]The poem was written by an anonymous Marine Corps officer:[/ltr]
[ltr] [/ltr]
[ltr]"THE BATTLING BOYS OF BENGHAZI"[/ltr]
[ltr] [/ltr]
[ltr]We're the battling boys of Benghazi, [/ltr]
[ltr] [/ltr]
[ltr]No fame, no glory, no paparazzi. [/ltr]
[ltr] [/ltr]
[ltr]Just a fiery death in a blazing hell, [/ltr]
[ltr] [/ltr]
[ltr]Defending our country we loved so well. [/ltr]
[ltr] [/ltr]
[ltr]It wasn't our job, but we answered the call, [/ltr]
[ltr] [/ltr]
[ltr]Fought to the Consulate and scaled the wall. [/ltr]
[ltr] [/ltr]
[ltr]We pulled twenty countrymen from the jaws of fate, [/ltr]
[ltr] [/ltr]
[ltr]Led them to safety and stood at the gate. [/ltr]
[ltr] [/ltr]
[ltr]Just the two of us and foes by the score,[/ltr]
[ltr] [/ltr]
[ltr]But we stood fast to bar the door. [/ltr]
[ltr] [/ltr]
[ltr]Three calls for reinforcement, but all were denied, [/ltr]
[ltr] [/ltr]
[ltr]So we fought and we fought and we fought until we died. [/ltr]
[ltr] [/ltr]
[ltr]We gave our all for our Uncle Sam, [/ltr]
[ltr] [/ltr]
[ltr]But Barack and Hillary didn't give a damn. [/ltr]
[ltr] [/ltr]
[ltr]Just two dead Seals who carried the load [/ltr]
[ltr] [/ltr]
[ltr]No thanks to us ... we were just "Bumps in the Road."[/ltr]
[ltr] [/ltr]
[ltr]So, will this reach every American with a computer? Or do we act like the press and give a pass to the people who literally sat there in the White House and watched the Seals' execution on live streaming video and did absolutely nothing?[/ltr]
[ltr] [/ltr]
[ltr]"What difference does it make?"[/ltr]
[ltr] [/ltr]
[ltr]And she wants to be the next President![/ltr]
[ltr] [/ltr]
[ltr] ***************[/ltr]
[ltr]IN GOD WE TRUST[/ltr]
[ltr]*************** [/ltr]
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 49265
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 72
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.6forum.info

Back to top Go down

Re: ABOUT BENGHAZI

Post  Admin on Sun 23 Oct 2016, 6:42 pm

http://pamelageller.com/2015/10/clinton-state-department-approved-u-s-weapons-shipment-to-libyan-jihadists-despite-ban.html/
Clinton State Department approved U.S. weapons shipment to Libyan jihadists despite ban
ByPAMELA GELLER on October 22, 2015
Hillary Rodham Clinton’s State Department initially approved a weapons shipment to jihadists seeking to oust Moammar Gadhafi in 2011, even though a United Nations arms ban was in place, according to memos recovered from the burned-out compound in Benghazi.

The US government aligned with jihadists. It was no secret — I was writing  and warning about the al Qaeda fighters the Obama administration was supporting back  in Libya back in March 2011.
When those jihadists began slaughtering Americans, Hillary and Obama gave a stand down order and began to construct the big lie — first one video, then another.

“…… it was a very, very military type of operation they had knowledge of almost everything in the compound,” Young explained. “They knew where the gasoline was, they knew where the generators were, they knew where the safe room was, they knew more than they should have about that compound.” …. more here.

Two months before the fatal 2012 terrorist attack on the U.S. compound in Benghazi, then-Ambassador Chris Stevens requested 13 security personnel to help him safely travel around Libya, according to a cable reviewed by Fox News — but he was turned down.

In the July 9, 2012 cable, Stevens reported that, “Overall security conditions continue to be unpredictable, with large numbers of armed groups and individuals not under control of the central government, and frequent clashes in Tripoli and other major population centers.” The cable said 13 security personnel would be the “minimum” needed for “transportation security and incident response capability.”

But a congressional source said Patrick Kennedy, a deputy to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, turned down the request.

The cable sent under Stevens’ electronic signature shows that he was advocating for additional security and warning that the set-up did not meet State Department standards, as conditions deteriorated in the run-up to the attack that killed Stevens and three other Americans.

Clinton, now a Democratic presidential candidate, is set to testify Thursday before the congressional Benghazi committee at a hearing where the State Department’s security measures in Libya are likely to be a focal point. (FOX News)

Screen Shot 2015-10-22 at 10.58.50 AM

4009_001

In the year leading up to the 2012 attack, records show, there were 234 security incidents in Libya, 50 of which took place in Benghazi — including a June assassination attempt on the British ambassador in which a rocket-propelled grenade struck his vehicle. The team narrowly escaped.

benghazi_bloody_handprint_AP

“Clinton State Department approved U.S. weapons shipment to Libya despite ban,”

By John Solomon and Jeffrey Scott Shapiro – The Washington Times, October 20, 2015

Memos recovered from Benghazi compound divulge covert effort

The State Department initially approved a weapons shipment from a California company to Libyans seeking to oust Moammar Gadhafi in 2011 even though a United Nations arms ban was in place, according to memos recovered from the burned-out compound in Benghazi.

The documents, obtained by The Washington Times, show U.S. diplomats at the Benghazi compound were keeping track of several potential U.S.-sanctioned shipments to allies, one or more of which were destined for the Transitional National Council, the Libyan movement that was seeking to oust Gadhafi and form a new government.

At least one of those shipments, kept in a file marked “arms deal,” was supposed to come from Dolarian Capital Inc. of Fresno, California, according to an end use certificate from the State Department’s office of defense trade controls licensing that was contained in the file.

The shipment was to include rocket launchers, grenade launchers, 7,000 machine guns and 8 million rounds of ammunition, much of it new and inexpensive hardware originally produced in the former Soviet bloc of Eastern Europe, according to an itemized list included in the end use certificate.

Dolarian Capital, part of a small network of U.S. arms merchants that has worked with U.S. intelligence, confirmed one of its licensing requests to ship weapons via Kuwait to Libya was approved by the State Department in spring 2011 and then inexplicably revoked before the armaments were sent.

“Dolarian Capital submitted the end user certificate in question to the U.S. Department of State for review and issuance of a license to transfer the arms and ammunition to Libya. The U.S. Department of State responded with a approval, which was revoked shortly thereafter,” one of its attorneys said in a statement issued to The Washington Times. “As a result no arms or ammunition was shipped or delivered to Libya under the end user certificate.”

Nonetheless, the existence of the documents and the temporary approval of at least one U.S. arms shipment provides the most direct evidence that Hillary Rodham Clinton’s State Department was aware of efforts to get weapons into the hands of rebels seeking to oust Gadhafi.

Mrs. Clinton is set to testify Thursday during a highly anticipated appearance before the House Select Committee on Benghazi.

The Obama administration has been ambiguous about the exact role the United States played in arming the rebels who overthrew Gadhafi, even as arms merchants and former CIA officials have stated publicly that a covert program facilitated such weapons transfers through a network of friendly weapons brokers and third-party countries.

The issue is sensitive because a U.N. ban on weapons shipments to Libya was in place at the time, although the State Department had the authority to deem a specific shipment in the United States interest and permit its transference, officials said.

State Department spokesman Alec Gerlach declined to comment Tuesday, as did the CIA public affairs office.

To date, the public evidence of U.S. involvement in weapons trafficking to Libya has been episodic.

Reuters reported in 2011 that President Obama signed a special presidential directive that authorized covert U.S. action to destabilize Gadhafi and stand up a new regime, up to and including facilitating weapons transfers if it was deemed in the U.S. interest.

The New York Times, quoting anonymous officials, reported a year later that the Obama administration gave its secret blessing to some weapons shipments to Libyan rebels routed through Qatar during the height of the country’s revolution.

hillary-clinton-what-difference-does-it-make-benghazi-dead-americans-911

Fox News this summer quoted a former CIA official as providing testimony in a court case that the U.S. almost certainly ran a covert weapons operation to help arm the Libyan rebels.

But to date, no evidence has emerged publicly that the State Department had direct knowledge or involvement in reviewing potential shipments.

The Benghazi documents, however, show that U.S. diplomats in the consulate were monitoring a series of potential exports in spring and summer 2011 to third-party countries and that one or more were likely to land in Libya.

For instance, a June 28, 2011, email chain contained in a file titled “arms deal” documents an exchange among State Department employees about eight export licensing application numbers, indicating one or more of the shipments involved Libya’s Transitional National Council.

“DRL recommends BA L181-11 T6-F RWA — need decision from higher level on TNC,” reads one of the notations in the email.

DRL stands for the State Department’s Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor, and TNC is the interchangeable acronym for the Transitional National Council, the NATO-supported Libyan rebel government.

The email also references the office of defense trade controls licensing, the State directorate in charge of registering arms exports.

The Dolarian Capital papers, dated May 18, 2011, include an end-user certificate that outlines a long list of heavy former Eastern-bloc weaponry and artillery to be shipped from the California-based arms dealer first to Kuwait, and then to Libya.

chris stevens

“This is to certify the following items are to be delivered by Dolarian Capital, Inc. [of] Fresno, California, United States and secured by M/s Specter Consultancy Services G.T.C. [of] Kuwait City, Kuwait to the Ministry of Interior of the Translational [sic] Government of Libya. The Ministry of Interior has agreed the items are for the exclusive disposition of the Ministry of Interior of the Translational [sic] Government of Libya and will not be re-exported or transferred to any third countries,” the certificate reads.

Just one month earlier, Mrs. Clinton privately endorsed inside the State Department the idea of using arms merchants to help the Libyans. “Fyi. The idea of using private security experts to arm the opposition should be considered,” Mrs. Clinton wrote in an email to her most senior aides.

Dolarian Capital and other U.S. arms merchants — all legally registered with the State Department — have worked with U.S. intelligence over the years to move covert shipments into hot spots around the globe such as Iraq, Afghanistan and Nigeria.

It applied for several State Department licenses to ship weapons to Libya, but only one got approved and then only temporarily before being revoked. The one export listed in the certificate was among the smaller shipments the company proposed for Libya, according to people familiar with the applications. In each instance, State and other U.S. agencies were directly aware the end destinations for the weapons were in Libya.

Dolarian Capital also is listed in court records as the source of weapons for another U.S. arms dealer, Marc Turi, who sought permission to ship weapons to Libya during the same time frame. Mr. Turi since has been charged criminally with making false statements in his application for those shipments, and has publicly asserted that Mrs. Clinton’s State Department and other U.S. officials sanctioned his involvement.

Read the rest here…….http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/oct/20/hillary-clinton-state-department-approved-us-weapo/
Clinton State Department approved U.S. weapons shipment to Libya despite ban
Memos recovered from Benghazi compound divulge covert effort
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 49265
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 72
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.6forum.info

Back to top Go down

Re: ABOUT BENGHAZI

Post  Admin on Sun 16 Oct 2016, 2:47 pm

https://conservativedailypost.com/breaking-hillary-sent-1-email-showing-terrorists-how-to-kill-amb-chris-stevens/?utm_source=Push&utm_campaign=13_October&utm_medium=OneSignal
BREAKING: HILLARY EMAIL FOUND SHOWING INSTRUCTIONS FOR KILLING CHRIS STEVENS
Posted by Martin Walsh | Sep 5, 2016 | National Security
Hillary Allowed Amb. Stevens’ Exact Location To Be Revealed
Hillary Clinton has been destroyed with email hacks and document leaks for nearly two months now, and she will be waking up this morning to another one. In an email released Monday regarding Hillary’s Benghazi investigation, there was one specific message that detailed the exact location of Ambassador Chris Stevens. Because this email was sent through the unsecured server, it is highly probable that terrorists intercepted the message.

There were five relevant emails in the cache of Clinton emails that placed Amb. Stevens in harms way:

March 23, 2011: In this email, Clinton’s then-chief of staff Jacob Sullivan wrote to Clinton about the NATO mission in Libya. Sullivan also wrote that someone named Bill was “trying to make sure Chris Stevens gets into E. Libya.”
March 27, 2011: This is an email between two State Department officials that was then forwarded to Clinton. Regarding his location and travel plans, the email said, “The current game plan is for Mr. Stevens to move no later than Wednesday from Malta to Benghazi. He will stage off shore initially for a one day visit during which he will have meetings with TNC interlocutors and get a sense of the situation on the ground. The goal of this one day trip is for him to lay the groundwork for a stay of up to 30 days.”
April 8, 2011: An email among State Department employees that was later forwarded to Clinton said, “Security situation in Benghazi remains quiet. Chris Stevens & team are in the hotel, moving only for meetings as required.”
April 10, 2011: Another email among State Department employees later forwarded to Clinton marked said, “The situation in Ajdabiyah has worsened to the point where Stevens is considering departure from Benghazi. The envoy’s delegation is currently doing a phased checkout.
April 24, 2011: A final email among State Department employees later forwarded to Clinton: “Stevens will be meeting with MFA in one hour and will make a written request for better security at the hotel and for better security-related coordination. He still feels comfortable in the hotel. They are looking into the idea of moving into a villa, but that is some way off.”
Hillary Called Him Chris Smith, She Didn't Even Know His Name
Hillary Called Him Chris Smith, She Didn’t Even Know His Name
Read the email closely. It begins at the bottom with Hillary (H) writing in the subject line “Chris Smith.” Yes, Chris Smith was one of the Americans that was also killed, but it shows that the wrong name remained in the email chain. No one corrected it. And no one can argue that they were focused on “the situation,” because if they truly were, they would never have revealed his location 5 separate times in unsecured emails. Clinton claims to have been deeply affected by the death of an American Ambassador, yet she can’t even remember what his name is? Hillary allowed Benghazi to happen, she placed everyone at risk with her incompetence, and she is to blame for why he cannot go home to his family.

The emails above are from a chain of emails that reveal Ambassador Stevens‘ location was readily available to anyone who could hack into Hillary Clinton’s unsecured private email server. Which, according to the FBI, was not very hard to do. It is very possible that these emails were intercepted, but Hillary failed these Americans several times. She failed them when she declined to adequately supply and arm them when they requested it for months, she never answered their requests for help that night for 13 hours, and she still to this day lies about how she left our Americans exposed to an attack. She didn’t care then, and she never will. But we do. Here’s an awesome tribute video to Amb. Chris Stevens:

It is possible that we will never know whether terrorists intercepted the emails on Hillary’s non-secure personal server, especially given how many programs Clinton has used to wipe her server clean, but we do see a pattern here and the American people are not believing the lies she continues to spew. To make things worse, we know she doesn’t care. The mere fact that she is willing to put her own electoral chances above the lives of four Americans, including a U.S. ambassador, should tell you all you need to know about her.

And remember this: the Democrats rigged the election FOR her, it isn’t like they got stuck with her. She was their choice, they championed her as their nominee. So that speaks to many Democrats and reveals how corrupt and dishonest the entire party is. It’s time for America to stand up and say no. The time has come for us all to unite, and put an end to the Clinton Cartel before it is too late. Please like and share on Facebook if you agree that Hillary Clinton deserves to go to jail for her private email server, what she has done to this country, and for leaving Americans to die that night in Benghazi. Scroll down to comment below!
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 49265
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 72
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.6forum.info

Back to top Go down

Re: ABOUT BENGHAZI

Post  Admin on Thu 30 Jun 2016, 5:58 pm

Just a Minor Detail: AC-130U Gunship was On-Scene in Benghazi, Obama Refused to Let It Fire
PJ Media

If you don’t get torches-and-pitchforks irate about this, you are not an American:

The security officer had a laser on the target that was firing and repeatedly requested back-up support from a Specter gunship, which is commonly used by U.S. Special Operations forces to provide support to Special Operations teams on the ground involved in intense firefights. The fighting at the CIA annex went on for more than four hours — enough time for any planes based in Sigonella Air base, just 480 miles away, to arrive. Fox News has also learned that two separate Tier One Special operations forces were told to wait, among them Delta Force operators.

There were two AC-130Us deployed to Libya in March as part of Operation Unified Protector.

The AC-130U is a very effective third-generation fire-support aircraft, capable of continuous and extremely accurate fire onto multiple targets. It has been used numerous times in Iraq and Afghanistan to save pinned-down allied forces, and has even been credited with the surrender of the Taliban city of Kunduz

It was purpose-built for a select number of specific mission types, including point-defense against enemy attack. It was literally built for the kind of mission it could have engaged in over Benghazi, if the administration had let it fire. As the excerpt above clearly shows, we had assets on the ground “painting” the targets with the laser.

An AC-130U flies in a counter-clockwise “pivot turn” around the target, with the weapons all aimed out the left side of the aircraft.

There are two state-of-the-art fire-control systems (FCSs) in a AC-130U, using television sensors,infrared sensors, and synthetic

FOR ENTIRE ARTICLE CLICK LINK
http://www.redflagnews.com/headlines/update-ac-130-gunship-was-on-scene-in-benghazi-with-cia-officer-on-ground-pointing-laser-designator-at-target-obama-admin-refused-to-let-it-fire
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 49265
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 72
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.6forum.info

Back to top Go down

Re: ABOUT BENGHAZI

Post  Admin on Wed 29 Jun 2016, 9:02 pm

House Benghazi Report Details Military, Intelligence Failures
Report says U.S. did not attempt to deploy assets, troops during Benghazi attack
BY: Alana Goodman  
June 28, 2016 5:00 am


The U.S. military never attempted to deploy any assets or troops to Benghazi during the 13-hour attack on the American consulate in 2012, according to a supplemental report released by the House Select Committee on Benghazi on Tuesday morning.
Although Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta has said he ordered three support teams to deploy to Benghazi about two hours into the attack, the committee said it found no evidence that these forces were mobilized until hours after the attack ended. Military assets, such as fighter planes and armed drones never left the ground, according to the report.
“We are now convinced, contrary to the administration’s public claim that the military did not have time to get to Benghazi, that the administration never launched men or machines to help directly in the fight,” wrote Reps. Mike Pompeo (R., Kan.) and Jim Jordan (R., Ohio) in the analysis. “That is very different from what we have been told to date. And the evidence is compelling.”
The congressmen issued their assessment as a supplement to the long-awaited report by the Benghazi Committee. According to the analysis, the Obama administration was fixated on how to frame the Sept. 11, 2012, terrorist attack to the public, and spent little time trying to coordinate a military response while the attack was ongoing.
The attack took place less than two months before the 2012 presidential election. There were early indications the assault was planned—such as targeted mortar fire—but Obama administration officials initially linked it to spontaneous anti-American protests that had occurred the same day in Cairo.
Four Americans died in the 13-hour battle: U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens, Foreign Service officer Sean Smith, and CIA contractors Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty.
In the hours and days that followed the assault, Secretary Hillary Clinton, United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice, and other administration officials publicly suggested that the attack spontaneously spun out of a protest over an anti-Islam video.
Officials later blamed this erroneous assessment on conflicting intelligence and confusion during the attack. But diplomatic security agents who spoke to the committee said there were no signs or reports of protests on the ground and it was clear early on that they were facing a coordinated terrorist assault.
The House Benghazi Committee, led by Chairman Trey Gowdy (R., S.C.), has interviewed nearly 100 witnesses and reviewed over 75,000 pages of documents as part of its investigation into the attack.
The committee’s report relied on testimony that diplomatic security agents at the compound gave to the committee. One of the agents said there was “Zip, nothing, nada” to indicate that there were protests in Benghazi leading up to the attack. Another agent who said there was no sign of protesters was also providing dispatches to Washington “every 15 to 30 minutes throughout the night—giving the State Department virtually a front row seat to the attack.”
Other security officials said there were signs of growing threats in Benghazi in the months leading up to the attack. Nine months earlier, one diplomatic security officer testified that he told a State Department security desk officer shortly after arriving in Benghazi that his trip there “was a suicide mission; that there was a very good chance that everybody here was going to die; that there was absolutely no ability here to prevent an attack whatever.”
The desk officer in Washington reportedly responded that “everybody back here in D.C. knows that people are going to die in Benghazi, and nobody cares and nobody is going to care until somebody does die.”
But according to committee testimony from security officers, there was pressure from Washington for the outpost to remain open in Benghazi and for Ambassador Chris Stevens to bring the State Department a “deliverable”—a permanent consulate in Benghazi.
The report also referred to an internal State Department talking points memo, which was circulated by a public relations officer on September 17, 2012. The document said officials “have not yet seen any signs that the attack on our consulate in Benghazi was other than premeditated or coordinated.” But in the draft obtained by the Benghazi committee, there were strike marks through words “premeditated or coordinated” and they were replaced by the word “spontaneous.”
According to Reps. Pompeo and Jordan, the document suggests that the State Department changed its public comments to reflect UN Ambassador Rice’s televised claim that the attack was “spontaneous.”
“No one asked about it could explain the change,” wrote the congressmen. “The change—from the truth to a known false statement—is troubling.”
Democrats on the Benghazi Committee, who have been critical of the investigation, released their own report blasting Gowdy on Monday.
They accused the committee chairman of “trying to land a front-page conviction rather than a neutral judge of facts seeking to improve the security of our diplomatic corps.”
A spokesperson for Gowdy responded by accusing Democrats of failing to participate in the committee’s investigation and obstructing it in order to defend Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.
“As Chairman Gowdy has said, this is not about one person,” said spokesman Matt Wolking. “This investigation is about the four brave Americans we lost in Libya: Chris Stevens, Sean Smith, Tyrone Woods, and Glen Doherty. That is how the Majority has conducted its thorough investigation, and we look forward to revealing the new information we have uncovered to the families and the American people.”
This entry was posted in National Security and tagged Benghazi. Bookmark the permalink.
http://freebeacon.com/national-security/house-benghazi-report-details-military-intelligence-failures/?utm_source=Freedom+Mail&utm_campaign=06ef75c8fb-WFB_Morning_Beacon_6_28_166_27_2016&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_b5e6e0e9ea-06ef75c8fb-45631117
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 49265
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 72
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.6forum.info

Back to top Go down

Re: ABOUT BENGHAZI

Post  Admin on Tue 28 Jun 2016, 11:09 pm

http://pamelageller.com/2016/06/final-benghazi-report-to-show-white-house-clinton-pushed-false-story-they-lied-our-boys-died-pr-was-priority.html/

Final Benghazi Report: White House, Clinton LIED, Our Boys DIED, PR was Priority, Obsession with Marine Uniforms
ByPAMELA GELLER on June 28, 2016
LIBYA 9 Comments
    
hillary-clinton-what-difference-does-it-make-benghazi-dead-americans-911
“WH [White House] very worried about the politics. This was all their doing.” [pg. 132]

The Benghazi Committee has released their final report.

The public statements made by Obama and Hillary Obama on the Benghazi attacks are strikingly at odds with what private communications reveal. It is devastating.This should be Hillary’s Waterloo. But we are living under the spiked boot of a left-wing apparatus with near total control of the elite media. There will be an eerie silence on this in the vast enemedia echo chamber.

The Obama administration knowingly provided the American people a false story about the Benghazi attack, its causes and its consequences. (Steven Hayes)

As the Benghazi attack unfolded, the two-hour White House meeting focused on public relations.

State Department officials on an emergency conference call during the Benghazi attack brought up concerns about whether Marines that might have been deployed should wear uniforms — something officials previously said could hurt diplomacy in the region, according to House Benghazi investigators….. (here)

A Fleet Antiterrorism Security Team (FAST) sat on a plane in Rota, Spain, for three hours, and changed in and out of their uniforms four times.

Benghazi is a dark hour for America and darker still as no price has been been paid. There has been no justice, no repercussions for the ghouls – the murderers of our people- not just in Libya but in the Beltway.

Not only did she stand by as the attacks unfolded for hours,  she created conditions for the attack.

benghazi2

rice

With the deteriorating situation on the ground in Tripoli and Benghazi, hundreds of requests for additional security for the Americans in Libya went unanswered or denied. No precautionary measures were taken, even as the September 11, 2001 anniversary was approaching.

Additional security was denied even though intelligence reports clearly indicated the presence in Libya of Al Qaeda and other terrorist groups hostile to the United States. Even though there had been multiple previous attacks against the diplomatic missions of other countries, and the U.S.’s own outpost in Benghazi, those requests were ignored leading up to the events of September 11th.

It was lunacy on a grand scale. (The Hill)

This should end Hillary.

The following facts are among the many new revelations in Part I:

Despite President Obama and Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta’s clear orders to deploy military assets, nothing was sent to Benghazi, and nothing was en route to Libya at the time the last two Americans were killed almost 8 hours after the attacks began. [pg. 141]
With Ambassador Stevens missing, the White House convened a roughly two-hour meeting at 7:30 PM, which resulted in action items focused on a YouTube video, and others containing the phrases “[i]f any deployment is made,” and “Libya must agree to any deployment,” and “[w]ill not deploy until order comes to go to either Tripoli or Benghazi.” [pg. 115]
The Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff typically would have participated in the White House meeting, but did not attend because he went home to host a dinner party for foreign dignitaries. [pg. 107]
A Fleet Antiterrorism Security Team (FAST) sat on a plane in Rota, Spain, for three hours, and changed in and out of their uniforms four times. [pg. 154]
None of the relevant military forces met their required deployment timelines. [pg. 150]
The Libyan forces that evacuated Americans from the CIA Annex to the Benghazi airport was not affiliated with any of the militias the CIA or State Department had developed a relationship with during the prior 18 months. Instead, it was comprised of former Qadhafi loyalists who the U.S. had helped remove from power during the Libyan revolution. [pg. 144]
Rep. Mike Pompeo (KS-04) released the following statement regarding these findings:

“We expect our government to make every effort to save the lives of Americans who serve in harm’s way. That did not happen in Benghazi. Politics were put ahead of the lives of Americans, and while the administration had made excuses and blamed the challenges posed by time and distance, the truth is that they did not try.”

Rep. Martha Roby (AL-02) released the following statement regarding these findings:

“Our committee’s insistence on additional information about the military’s response to the Benghazi attacks was met with strong opposition from the Defense Department, and now we know why. Instead of attempting to hide deficiencies in our posture and performance, it’s my hope our report will help ensure we fix what went wrong so that a tragedy like this never happens again.”

The following facts are among the many new revelations in Part II:

Five of the 10 action items from the 7:30 PM White House meeting referenced the video, but no direct link or solid evidence existed connecting the attacks in Benghazi and the video at the time the meeting took place. The State Department senior officials at the meeting had access to eyewitness accounts to the attack in real time. The Diplomatic Security Command Center was in direct contact with the Diplomatic Security Agents on the ground in Benghazi and sending a “Terrorism Event Notification.” The State Department Watch Center had also notified Jake Sullivan and Cheryl Mills that it had set up a direct telephone line to Tripoli. There was no mentiot out multiple updates about the situation, inclun of the video from the agents on the ground. Greg Hicks—one of the last people to talk to Chris Stevens before he died—said there was virtually no discussion about the video in Libya leading up to the attacks. [pg. 28]
The morning after the attacks, the National Security Council’s Deputy Spokesperson sent an email to nearly two dozen people from the White House, Defense Department, State Department, and intelligence community, stating: “Both the President and Secretary Clinton released statements this morning. … Please refer to those for any comments for the time being. To ensure we are all in sync on messaging for the rest of the day, Ben Rhodes will host a conference call for USG communicators on this chain at 9:15 ET today.” [pg. 39]
Minutes before the President delivered his speech in the Rose Garden, Jake Sullivan wrote in an email to Ben Rhodes and others: “There was not really much violence in Egypt. And we are not saying that the violence in Libya erupted ‘over inflammatory videos.’” [pg. 44]
According to Susan Rice, both Ben Rhodes and David Plouffe prepared her for her appearances on the Sunday morning talk shows following the attacks. Nobody from the FBI, Department of Defense, or CIA participated in her prep call. While Rhodes testified Plouffe would “normally” appear on the Sunday show prep calls, Rice testified she did not recall Plouffe being on prior calls and did not understand why he was on the call in this instance. [pg.98]
On the Sunday shows, Susan Rice stated the FBI had “already begun looking at all sorts of evidence” and “FBI has a lead in this investigation.” But on Monday, the Deputy Director, Office of Maghreb Affairs sent an email stating: “McDonough apparently told the SVTS [Secure Video Teleconference] group today that everyone was required to ‘shut their pieholes’ about the Benghazi attack in light of the FBI investigation, due to start tomorrow.” [pg. 135]
After Susan Rice’s Sunday show appearances, Jake Sullivan assured the Secretary of the State that Rice “wasn’t asked about whether we had any intel. But she did make clear our view that this started spontaneously and then evolved.” [pg. 128]
Susan Rice’s comments on the Sunday talk shows were met with shock and disbelief by State Department employees in Washington. The Senior Libya Desk Officer, Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs, State Department, wrote: “I think Rice was off the reservation on this one.” The Deputy Director, Office of Press and Public Diplomacy, Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs, State Department, responded: “Off the reservation on five networks!” The Senior Advisor for Strategic Communications, Bureau of Near East Affairs, State Department, wrote: “WH [White House] very worried about the politics. This was all their doing.” [pg. 132]
The CIA’s September 13, 2012, intelligence assessment was rife with errors. On the first page, there is a single mention of “the early stages of the protest” buried in one of the bullet points. The article cited to support the mention of a protest in this instance was actually from September 4. In other words, the analysts used an article from a full week before the attacks to support the premise that a protest had occurred just prior to the attack on September 11. [pg. 47]
A headline on the following page of the CIA’s September 13 intelligence assessment stated “Extremists Capitalized on Benghazi Protests,” but nothing in the actual text box supports that title. As it turns out, the title of the text box was supposed to be “Extremists Capitalized on Cairo Protests.” That small but vital difference—from Cairo to Benghazi—had major implications in how people in the administration were able to message the attacks. [pg. 52]
Rep. Jim Jordan (OH-04) released the following statement regarding these findings:

“Obama Administration officials, including the Secretary of State, learned almost in real time that the attack in Benghazi was a terrorist attack. Rather than tell the American people the truth, the administration told one story privately and a different story publicly.”

Rep. Peter Roskam (IL-06) released the following statement regarding these findings:

“In the days and weeks after the attacks, the White House worked to pin all of the blame for their misleading and incorrect statements on officials within the intelligence community, but in reality, political operatives like Ben Rhodes and David Plouffe were spinning the false narrative and prepping Susan Rice for her interviews.”

The following facts are among the many new revelations in Part III:

During deliberations within the State Department about whether and how to intervene in Libya in March 2011, Jake Sullivan listed the first goal as “avoid[ing] a failed state, particularly one in which al-Qaeda and other extremists might take safe haven.” [pg. 9]
The administration’s policy of no boots on the ground shaped the type of military assistance provided to State Department personnel in Libya. The Executive Secretariats for both the Defense Department and State Department exchanged communications outlining the diplomatic capacity in which the Defense Department SST security team members would serve, which included wearing civilian clothes so as not to offend the Libyans. [pg. 60]
When the State Department’s presence in Benghazi was extended in December 2012, senior officials from the Bureau of Diplomatic Security were excluded from the discussion. [pg. 74]
In February 2012, the lead Diplomatic Security Agent at Embassy Tripoli informed his counterpart in Benghazi that more DS agents would not be provided by decision makers, because “substantive reporting” was not Benghazi’s purpose. [pg. 77]
Emails indicate senior State Department officials, including Cheryl Mills, Jake Sullivan, and Huma Abedin were preparing for a trip by the Secretary of State to Libya in October 2012. According to testimony, Chris Stevens wanted to have a “deliverable” for the Secretary for her trip to Libya, and that “deliverable” would be making the Mission in Benghazi a permanent Consulate. [pg. 96]
In August 2012—roughly a month before the Benghazi attacks—security on the ground worsened significantly. Ambassador Stevens initially planned to travel to Benghazi in early August, but cancelled the trip “primarily for Ramadan/security reasons.” [pg. 99]
Former Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta bluntly told the committee “an intelligence failure” occurred with respect to Benghazi. Former CIA Deputy Director Michael Morell also acknowledged multiple times an intelligence failure did in fact occur prior to the Benghazi attacks. [pg. 129]
Rep. Susan Brooks (IN-05) released the following statement regarding these findings:

“President Obama has said his worst mistake was ‘failing to plan for the day after … intervening in Libya.’ As a result of this ‘lead from behind’ foreign policy, the Libyan people were forced to make the dismal trade of the tyranny of Qadhafi for the terror of ISIS, Al-Qaeda and others. Although the State Department considered Libya a grave risk to American diplomats in 2011 and 2012, our people remained in a largely unprotected, unofficial facility that one diplomatic security agent the committee interviewed characterized as ‘a suicide mission.’”

Rep. Lynn Westmoreland (GA-03) released the following statement regarding these findings:

“One of the most concerning parts of the State Department’s policy in Libya was its reliance upon the militias of an unstable nation to protect our men and women in Benghazi. These were by no means forces that could adequately protect Americans on the ground, and the State Department knew it. But the appearance of no boots on the ground was more important to the administration.”

Part IV of the report reveals new information about the Select Committee’s requests and subpoenas seeking documents and witnesses regarding Benghazi and Libya, and details what the Obama administration provided to Congress, what it is still withholding, and how its serial delays hindered the committee’s efforts to uncover the truth.

Part V proposes 25 recommendations for the Pentagon, State Department, Intelligence Community and Congress aimed at strengthening security for American personnel serving abroad and doing everything possible to ensure something like Benghazi never happens again, and if it does, that we are better prepared to respond, the majority make a series of recommendations.

The Select Committee intends to convene a bipartisan markup to discuss and vote on the proposed report on July 8, 2016. All members of the committee will have the opportunity to offer changes in a manner consistent with the rules of the House.

Below is the full report with links to PDF files of each section.

- See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2016/06/final-benghazi-report-to-show-white-house-clinton-pushed-false-story-they-lied-our-boys-died-pr-was-priority.html/#sthash.S9tyaOqx.dpuf
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 49265
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 72
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.6forum.info

Back to top Go down

Re: ABOUT BENGHAZI

Post  Admin on Fri 03 Jun 2016, 9:53 pm

http://wonkette.com/550518/allen-west-pretty-sure-bowe-bergdahls-dad-made-the-white-house-a-mosque#Vd1dT5JiqzjQAI5i.01

Extract from this article: “What none of these media is reporting is that the father’s (SGT Bowe Bergdahl’s father Bob) first words at the WH were in Arabic – those words were “bism allah alrahman alraheem” – which means “in the name of Allah the most gracious and most merciful” – these are the opening words of every chapter of the Qur’an except one (the chapter of the sword – the 9th) – by uttering these words on the grounds of the WH, Bergdahl (the father) sanctified the WH and claimed it for Islam. There is no question but POTUS knows this.”

OMG you guys! Disgraced former torturer Allen West, super-patriot and Muslim-Hunter extraordinaire, has been tipped off to some earth-shattering proof of Muslim perfidy and scary creeping — or galloping! — sharia law! After spending the weekend calling Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl a “deserter” and hinting that there’s something “nefarious” about his release from the Taliban, and about Bergdahl’s father, Bob Bergdahl (who apparently doesn’t hate Muslims enough at all), West has revealed a “bombshell”: Bob Bergdahl spoke Arabic at the White House! Not only that, but he pretty much made the White House a holy Muslim shrine by doing that, according to a very smart person who emailed Allen West.

West says that he got an email from Clare Lopez, a “former CIA operations officer” who knows all sorts of stuff about Islam and the Middle East, and who is a personal friend of one Allen West. Lopez completely blows the lid off a huge cover-up, he says!

She emailed me this morning a very poignant analysis that only someone knowing language and Islam could ascertain. She wrote:

“What none of these media is reporting is that the father’s (SGT Bowe Bergdahl’s father Bob) first words at the WH were in Arabic – those words were “bism allah alrahman alraheem” – which means “in the name of Allah the most gracious and most merciful” – these are the opening words of every chapter of the Qur’an except one (the chapter of the sword – the 9th) – by uttering these words on the grounds of the WH, Bergdahl (the father) sanctified the WH and claimed it for Islam. There is no question but POTUS knows this.”

Folks, there is a lot to this whole episode — like Benghazi — that we may never know. And this is not conspiracy theory, it is truth based upon Arabic and Islamic dogma and tradition.

Is America going to continue to let Barack Hussein Obama invite parents of rescued POWs to the White House and claim it for Islam? This is not a conspiracy theory, this is genuine honest-to-god disloyalty to America. Or maybe — and we’re going to go out on a limb here — it’s a routine phrase in Muslim Prayer that doesn’t actually have any magical power whatsoever, except perhaps the power to freak out wingnuts.

Get ready for a lot more of this idiocy, folks; somehow, the fact that Bowe Bergdahl’s dad is sympathetic to Muslims has also been Very Big with the Stupidest Man on the Internet. Here’s how terrifying Bob Bergdahl is: He said a phrase in Arabic, and then OBAMA HUGGED HIM! That just doesn’t wash off, you know.

Be afraid. Be very afraid. And while you’re at it, maybe you should buy some more guns.

[Allen West / Gateway Pundit]


Read more at http://wonkette.com/550518/allen-west-pretty-sure-bowe-bergdahls-dad-made-the-white-house-a-mosque#lwFxHLy1dKlbju9H.99
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 49265
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 72
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.6forum.info

Back to top Go down

Re: ABOUT BENGHAZI

Post  Admin on Sun 29 May 2016, 9:35 pm

http://overpassesforamerica.com/?p=9611
DECLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS REVEAL OBAMA KNEW OF ATTACK ON BENGHAZI BEFORE IT HAPPENED
MAY 28, 2016by ADMINin MIDDLE EAST & WORLD
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it obtained more than 100 pages of previously classified “Secret” documents from the Department of Defense (DOD)and the Department of State revealing that DOD almost immediately reported that the attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi was committed by the al Qaeda and Muslim Brotherhood-linked “Brigades of the Captive Omar Abdul Rahman” (BCOAR), and had been planned at least 10 days in advance.

Rahman is known as the Blind Sheikh, and is serving life in prison for his involvement in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing and other terrorist acts. The new documents also provide the first official confirmation that shows the U.S. government was aware of arms shipments from Benghazi to Syria. The documents also include an August 2012 analysis warning of the rise of ISIS and the predicted failure of the Obama policy of regime change in Syria.

The documents were released in response to a court order in accordance with a May 15, 2014, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed against both the DOD and State Department seeking communications between the two agencies and congressional leaders “on matters related to the activities of any agency or department of the U.S. government at the Special Mission Compound and/or classified annex in Benghazi.”

A Defense Department document from the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), dated September 12, 2012, the day after the Benghazi attack, details that the attack on the compound had been carefully planned by the BOCAR terrorist group “to kill as many Americans as possible.” The document was sent to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, then-Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Obama White House National Security Council. The heavily redacted Defense Department “information report” says that the attack on the Benghazi facility “was planned and executed by The Brigades of the Captive Omar Abdul Rahman (BCOAR).” The group subscribes to “AQ ideologies:”

The attack was planned ten or more days prior on approximately 01 September 2012. The intention was to attack the consulate and to kill as many Americans as possible to seek revenge for U.S. killing of Aboyahiye ((ALALIBY)) in Pakistan and in memorial of the 11 September 2001 atacks on the World Trade Center buildings.

“A violent radical,” the DIA report says, is “the leader of BCOAR is Abdul Baset ((AZUZ)), AZUZ was sent by ((ZAWARI)) to set up Al Qaeda (AQ) bases in Libya.” The group’s headquarters was set up with the approval of a “member of the Muslim brother hood movement…where they have large caches of weapons. Some of these caches are disguised by feeding troughs for livestock. They have SA-7 and SA-23/4 MANPADS…they train almost every day focusing on religious lessons and scriptures including three lessons a day of jihadist ideology.”

The Defense Department reported the group maintained written documents, in “a small rectangular room, approximately 12 meters by 6 meters…that contain information on all of the AQ activity in Libya.”

(Azuz is again blamed for the Benghazi attack in an October 2012 DIA document.)

The DOD documents also contain the first official documentation that the Obama administration knew that weapons were being shipped from the Port of Benghazi to rebel troops in Syria. An October 2012 report confirms:

Weapons from the former Libya military
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 49265
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 72
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.6forum.info

Back to top Go down

Re: ABOUT BENGHAZI

Post  Admin on Wed 20 Apr 2016, 11:26 pm

http://www.breitbart.com/video/2016/04/18/mother-of-benghazi-victim-hillary-ought-to-be-wearing-stripes-my-son-is-dead-because-of-her/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social

Mother of Benghazi Victim: Hillary ‘Ought to Be Wearing Stripes,’ ‘My Son Is Dead Because of Her’
by IAN HANCHETT18 Apr 20163,008
Patricia Smith, whose son, Sean, was killed in the September 11, 2012 terrorist attacks in Benghazi, Libya said that Democratic presidential candidate former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton “ought to be wearing stripes” and “My son is dead because of her” on Monday’s “Varney & Co.” on the Fox Business Network.

Smith said, “My feeling is that she went on TV afterwards, telling everybody that I was the liar, that there’s someone here that is lying, and it wasn’t her, and that I was liar. I want her to apologize to me for calling me a liar on TV, because this is clearly not true. And I want to know why my son was left to die breathing in diesel smoke, which is the most horrible way to die, and she didn’t do anything to stop it. She could have.”

Smith added that Hillary “ought to be in — she ought to be wearing stripes. I want to see this woman in stripes, because she lied, and the different things that she did say, were very, totally wrong. My son is dead because of her. I would like to talk to her, even though I know I would be the bad one in that.”

Smith also stated that she hadn’t been contacted by anyone to do media appearances “other than local radio stations and Fox stations, and I’ve talked to them.”

Follow Ian Hanchett on Twitter @IanHanchett

Read More Stories About:
Breitbart TV, 2016 Presidential Race, Hillary Clinton, Benghazi, Sean Smith, Patricia Smith
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 49265
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 72
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.6forum.info

Back to top Go down

Re: ABOUT BENGHAZI

Post  Admin on Tue 22 Mar 2016, 12:42 am

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2012/11/06/whos-to-blame-for-benghazi-a-laymans-guide/
Who\u2019s to blame for Benghazi? A layman\u2019s guide
By Max Fisher November 6, 2012 
 
An empty shell casing in the U.S. consulate compound in Benghazi. (Gianluigi  Guercia/AFP/Getty Images)
The Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi killed four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens, raised questions about the stability of post-Gaddafi Libya, and ultimately became a major political controversy in the weeks ahead of Tuesday's U.S. presidential election. The political debate around Benghazi has often turned on an implicit (and sometimes quite explicit) question: Who messed up? That question hasn't been easy to follow, both because of the slow trickle of information about the incident and because so much of the domestic conversation has been colored by its political implications.

This is an attempt to objectively consider the various individuals and groups connected to the Benghazi incident, what's been publicly reported about their roles so far, and what that information suggests about their potential responsibility.

Because the picture of what actually happened before, during and after the attack is so incomplete and hazy, these appraisals are necessarily speculative and should be taken with a grain of salt. Rather than a definitive determination of fault, they should be considered estimations based on the publicly available information \u2013 a picture that could change dramatically as new information comes out. Still, taken together, they show both how widely dispersed the blame could be and how relatively minor, individual mistakes may have added up to something larger.

State Department: A mid-level denial to boost security

A mid-level official at the State Department had denied requests for a handful of additional security officers at the Benghazi consulate, despite a marked uptick in violence and the shortcomings of Libyan security forces. Warning signs, including a June bombing outside the consulate, did not appear to lead the department to beef up security. The largest request was for 12 additional men; there were five at the time of the attack. The State Department necessarily relies on its host government for security, and maybe in this case the CIA as well, although ultimate responsibility for State Department security would seem to rest with the agency itself. There's no evidence that the security requests went higher than the mid-level official.
Central Intelligence Agency: 'Emergency security' couldn't save ambassador 

The consulate in Benghazi had a secret arrangement with nearby CIA forces that were to provide "emergency security." The Wall Street Journal said in reporting the arrangement: "The CIA\u2019s secret role helps explain why security appeared inadequate at the U.S. diplomatic facility." A seven-person CIA security force responded within 50 minutes of the initial attack but, in the chaos of the battle, did not retrieve the ambassador. A number of observers have raised the obvious question of why the CIA did not see this attack coming, given its apparent scale. It's worth noting that Libya is awash in small arms and militias, which would seem to make monitoring them unusually difficult.

Pentagon: Quick-reaction force wasn't ready 

A New York Times report on the Pentagon's Africa command found that "forces in the region had not been adequately reconfigured" to respond to the attack. The Africa command AFRICOM, formed in 2007 and responsible for all U.S. military in Africa, is still developing its quick-reaction force and had to "borrow" one based in Europe. "Critics say there has been a gap in the command\u2019s quick-reaction capability, which the force would have helped fill," according to the Times. Still, the force would have been based in Sicily, so it's doubtful the troops would have been able to arrive in time to defend against the initial assault.

Ambassador Chris Stevens: Stayed in town despite seeing risk 

As Foreign Policy's Blake Hounshell put it, "Nobody wants to say it, but Amb. Chris Stevens was a big boy and he made his own decision to go to Benghazi despite the risks. If he thought it was too dangerous, he should not have gone." And he had a reputation for jogging Libya's streets despite security threats. Still, Stevens clearly sought greater security in Benghazi from local and national Libyan officials. It's not clear whether or not he made similar appeals to U.S. officials, but he seemed to take the security situation seriously.

February 17 Brigade: Hired to defend consulate, unreachable during the attack 

This Libyan militia, the most powerful security force in post-Gaddafi Benghazi, was officially designated to guard the consulate, fulfilling the Libyan state's responsibility. Stevens had made appeals to local and national Libyan officials complaining that their Libyan security was insufficient, reflecting concerns that February 17 wasn't up to the task. On the night of the attack, the CIA urgently tried and failed to raise the militiamen. That's a big deal, suggesting a degree of irresponsibility and/or incompetence. (There's no indication of malicious intent.) Still, given that this is a citizen militia fulfilling a role usually played by a country's military or domestic security services, how did its disappointing performance take U.S. agencies by quite such surprise?

Libyan government: Struggling to provide basic security

The Vienna Convention requires host countries to assume responsibility for foreign diplomatic buildings. Libya, it seems, was just not up to the task. Michael Birnbaum found officials and agencies "on autopilot as the new lawmakers plot alliances and betrayals over endless cups of coffee in Tripoli." Stevens had protested to senior officials that Benghazi's security was insufficient, although given that the consulate was relying on a citizen militia, it's not clear what Tripoli could have done. After four decades of dictatorship and the recent civil war, the central state just does not yet have a hold on basic security functions. Still, as with February 17, one question is whether or not the U.S. agencies should have been able to foresee these shortcomings.

Congressional Republicans: A 10 percent security budget cut

Some critics, including Vice President Biden, have noted that the GOP-led House of Representatives reduced appropriations for embassy security, which ultimately came to about 90 percent of what the administration requested, a drop of $270 million. Still, assuming that the cuts were proportional, it's hard to see this being decisive. Returning the funding to the full amount would have increased the number of dollars by only 10 percent; boosting the Benghazi security by 10 percent (from five guards to five and a half?) seems unlikely to have turned the tide.

President Obama, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, CIA Director David Petraeus

The details of bureaucratic infighting over consulate security might seem enormously significant now that they have undergone such public scrutiny, but it's very difficult to imagine those disputes reaching top U.S. leaders beforehand. The U.S. has 200-plus embassies and consulates abroad; their security requests are not cabinet-level decisions. Barring some extraordinary revelation, the strongest case for top-level responsibility is that these people oversee the people who oversee the people who made the decisions about security in Benghazi. That's not nothing, but it's not exactly the next Iran-Contra affair, either.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 49265
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 72
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.6forum.info

Back to top Go down

Re: ABOUT BENGHAZI

Post  Admin on Thu 03 Mar 2016, 9:23 pm

http://www.worldnewspolitics.com/2016/03/02/breaking-1-hillary-email-showed-terrorists-how-to-kill-amb-chris-stevens/
BREAKING: 1 HILLARY EMAIL SHOWED TERRORISTS HOW TO KILL AMB. CHRIS STEVENS [VIDEO]
MARCH 2, 2016
One of Hillary’s emails that was released on Monday pertaining to the Benghazi investigation that was part of her private email server contained a detailed location of murdered Ambassador Chris Stevens, which raised the possibility that terrorists could have intercepted the message.

Breitbart revealed that the email from April 10th, 2011, the State Department employee, Timmy Davis, forwarded an email to the server by Clinton’s aide, Huma Abedin.

Davis’ email read:

“The situation in Ajdabiyah has worsened to the point where Stevens is considering departure from Benghazi”

“The envoy’s delegation is currently doing a phased checkout (paying the hotel bills, moving some comms to the boat, etc). He will monitor the situation to see if it deteriorates further, but no decision has been made on departure. He will wait 2-3 more hours, then revisit the decision on departure.”

 

This is the last one of a chain of emails that contained Ambassador Stevens’ location and was almost readily available to anyone that could reach access to Clintons’ unsecured private email server.

Another email from March, 2011 stated:

“The current game plan is for Mr. Stevens to move no later than Wednesday from Malta to Benghazi. He will stage offshore initially for a one day visit during which he will have meetings with TNC (Transitional National Council) interlocutors and get a sense of the situation on the ground. The goal of this one day trip is for him to lay the groundwork for a stay of up to 30 days.”

Then, on April 8, another email reported that the “security situation in Benghazi remains quiet. Chris Stevens & team are in the hotel, moving only for meetings as required.”

On April 22, another email detailing Stevens’ travel plans: “I want to let you know about a temporary rotation in Benghazi. TNC Envoy Chris Stevens has been on the road since March 13, when he began his outreach mission, and has been in Benghazi since April 5.”

There was another email that had detailed information on Stevens’ plans, from April 22nd:

“I want to let you know about a temporary rotation in Benghazi. TNC Envoy Chris Stevens has been on the road since March 13, when he began his outreach mission, and has been in Benghazi since April 5.”

And then, on April 24, there was an email which told the exact time Ambassador Stevens would be having a meeting:

“Stevens will be meeting with MFA in one hour and will make a written request for better security at the hotel and for better security-related coordination. He still feels comfortable in the hotel. They are looking into the idea of moving into a villa, but that is some way off.”

Things will probably never be clear and we may never know whether terrorists could see the contents of Hillary’s non-secure server, especially given the amount of work she put in to keep them buried.

To make things worse, Hillary Clinton doesn’t care. She’s willing to put her own electoral chances above the lives of four Americans, including a U.S. ambassador.

Remembering Chris Stevens
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZtVcDXZBm8

And, in the end, the Democrats choice is this woman, imagine that! Okay America, it’s time to stand up and say no!

Share the story if you agree!
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 49265
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 72
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.6forum.info

Back to top Go down

Re: ABOUT BENGHAZI

Post  Admin on Wed 20 May 2015, 5:41 pm

It’s Now Clear The Stunning Negligence That Led Up To Chris Stevens’ Death In Benghazi
Two smoking guns hit the news streams this week: The U.S. indeed had a gun-running program pipelining Libyan weapons to Syrian rebels through a port in Benghazi; and at least some “intelligence” on action in Libya passed through not one, but at least two of Hillary Clinton’s “homebrew” email addresses.

It’s Clinton’s reliance on her civilian email servers for seemingly classified communications (indeed, all Department of State communications), coupled with the real nature of the mission in Benghazi, that lay bare the negligence leading up to the attack that took the lives of four Americans, including Amb. Chris Stevens and two former Navy SEALs.

In the November following the attack, The Wall Street Journal reported that the U.S. mission in Benghazi was “at it’s heart, a CIA operation.” It turns out the CIA Annex that had its cover blown during the attack was more than likely the central hub of an international gun running operation.
A source told Fox News two weeks after the attack that Stevens was in Benghazi meeting a Turkish diplomat to “negotiate a weapons transfer, in an effort to get SA-7 missiles out of the hands of violent extremists.” One hour after Stevens showed him the door, local Libyan guards “abandoned their posts” and the assault began.

We know that Moammar Gadhafi’s stockpile of SA-7 man-portable surface-to-air missiles concerned Western intelligence agencies, so much so that they quickly set up programs to locate and supposedly destroy these weapons in Libya. We also know that these weapons had, since Gadhafi’s fall, appeared in Mali in the hands of members of al-Qaida in the Islamic Meghreb through somewhat shady weapons deals.

So the alleged purpose of the CIA Annex was to rob extremist Peter of his heavy weapons and deliver the weapons to Syrian rebel Paul, putting the agency in direct competition with the same militia that attacked the consulate.

Perhaps coincidentally, some of the concern about the SA-7 market came through in emails to Clinton from Sidney Blumenthal. We already know how easily hackers scooped his information.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 49265
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 72
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.6forum.info

Back to top Go down

ABOUT BENGHAZI

Post  Admin on Mon 18 May 2015, 9:44 pm

Obama Admin knew Benghazi Attack Planned in Advance to Coincide With 9/11 Anniversary 

Obama used the attack on Benghazi to attack the First Amendment. Obama knew a 9/11 attack was in the works. Obama left our people there to die.
VIDEO
US intel knew about weapons going from Benghazi to Syria.


May 18, 2015 – 3:13 – Documents also reveal Defense Intelligence Agency predicted rise of ISIS.

Breaking news from Fox on Benghazi: CIA knew an attack against the USA Consulate was in the works ten-days before it happened. Nothing whatsoever to do with a “video” or any other red herring concocted by Obama and Hillary. Extra: Evidence builds that US intel knew about weapons going from Benghazi to Syria. (thanks to Dan F)
benghazi_burning_reuters
FOX News
Fox News has obtained documents which reveal what U.S. intelligence agencies knew about the Benghazi attack and weapons traveling from Libya to Syria back in 2012.

Catherine Herridge reported this morning on “America’s Newsroom” that a Defense Intelligence Agency memo from Sept. 16, 2012, concluded that the Benghazi terror attack was planned at least 10 days in advance to coincide with 9/11 and was in retaliation for a drone strike that killed an al Qaeda strategist. The memo was copied to the National Security Council, the State Department and the CIA.

“The intention was to attack the consulate and to kill as many Americans as possible to seek revenge for the [U.S.] killing of Aboyahiye (Alaliby) in Pakistan and in memorial of the 11 September 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center buildings,” the memo said.
Judicial Watch obtained the memos by suing in federal court.

The Obama administration says it was a coincidence that [the Benghazi attack] occurred on 9/11. In fact, their intelligence said it wasn’t a coincidence, and in fact, specifically the attack occurred because it was 9/11,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said.

Another 2012 DIA memo predicts the rise of ISIS and the establishment of a caliphate 17 months before President Barack Obama called ISIS “jay-vee.”
A third DIA memo, dated Oct. 5, 2012, leaves no doubt that U.S. intelligence agencies knew that weapons were moving from Libya to Syria before the attack that killed four Americans.
Former CIA Director Mike Morell recently dodged questions about these weapons in an interview with Bret Baier.
Baier asked him: Were CIA officers tracking the movement of weapons from Libya to Syria?
“Can’t talk about it,” Morell said.
- See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2015/05/obama-admin-knew-benghazi-attack-planned-in-advance-to-coincide-with-911-anniversary.html/#sthash.ecmiiKyE.dpuf
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 49265
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 72
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.6forum.info

Back to top Go down

Re: ABOUT BENGHAZI

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum