Who is online?
In total there are 7 users online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 7 Guests :: 1 Bot

None

[ View the whole list ]


Most users ever online was 111 on Thu 12 Dec 2013, 2:28 am
Latest topics
Navigation
 Portal
 Index
 Memberlist
 Profile
 FAQ
 Search

ABOUT BENGHAZI

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: ABOUT BENGHAZI

Post  Admin on Sun 29 May 2016, 9:35 pm

http://overpassesforamerica.com/?p=9611
DECLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS REVEAL OBAMA KNEW OF ATTACK ON BENGHAZI BEFORE IT HAPPENED
MAY 28, 2016by ADMINin MIDDLE EAST & WORLD
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it obtained more than 100 pages of previously classified “Secret” documents from the Department of Defense (DOD)and the Department of State revealing that DOD almost immediately reported that the attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi was committed by the al Qaeda and Muslim Brotherhood-linked “Brigades of the Captive Omar Abdul Rahman” (BCOAR), and had been planned at least 10 days in advance.

Rahman is known as the Blind Sheikh, and is serving life in prison for his involvement in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing and other terrorist acts. The new documents also provide the first official confirmation that shows the U.S. government was aware of arms shipments from Benghazi to Syria. The documents also include an August 2012 analysis warning of the rise of ISIS and the predicted failure of the Obama policy of regime change in Syria.

The documents were released in response to a court order in accordance with a May 15, 2014, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed against both the DOD and State Department seeking communications between the two agencies and congressional leaders “on matters related to the activities of any agency or department of the U.S. government at the Special Mission Compound and/or classified annex in Benghazi.”

A Defense Department document from the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), dated September 12, 2012, the day after the Benghazi attack, details that the attack on the compound had been carefully planned by the BOCAR terrorist group “to kill as many Americans as possible.” The document was sent to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, then-Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Obama White House National Security Council. The heavily redacted Defense Department “information report” says that the attack on the Benghazi facility “was planned and executed by The Brigades of the Captive Omar Abdul Rahman (BCOAR).” The group subscribes to “AQ ideologies:”

The attack was planned ten or more days prior on approximately 01 September 2012. The intention was to attack the consulate and to kill as many Americans as possible to seek revenge for U.S. killing of Aboyahiye ((ALALIBY)) in Pakistan and in memorial of the 11 September 2001 atacks on the World Trade Center buildings.

“A violent radical,” the DIA report says, is “the leader of BCOAR is Abdul Baset ((AZUZ)), AZUZ was sent by ((ZAWARI)) to set up Al Qaeda (AQ) bases in Libya.” The group’s headquarters was set up with the approval of a “member of the Muslim brother hood movement…where they have large caches of weapons. Some of these caches are disguised by feeding troughs for livestock. They have SA-7 and SA-23/4 MANPADS…they train almost every day focusing on religious lessons and scriptures including three lessons a day of jihadist ideology.”

The Defense Department reported the group maintained written documents, in “a small rectangular room, approximately 12 meters by 6 meters…that contain information on all of the AQ activity in Libya.”

(Azuz is again blamed for the Benghazi attack in an October 2012 DIA document.)

The DOD documents also contain the first official documentation that the Obama administration knew that weapons were being shipped from the Port of Benghazi to rebel troops in Syria. An October 2012 report confirms:

Weapons from the former Libya military
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 48024
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 72
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.6forum.info

Back to top Go down

Re: ABOUT BENGHAZI

Post  Admin on Wed 20 Apr 2016, 11:26 pm

http://www.breitbart.com/video/2016/04/18/mother-of-benghazi-victim-hillary-ought-to-be-wearing-stripes-my-son-is-dead-because-of-her/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social

Mother of Benghazi Victim: Hillary ‘Ought to Be Wearing Stripes,’ ‘My Son Is Dead Because of Her’
by IAN HANCHETT18 Apr 20163,008
Patricia Smith, whose son, Sean, was killed in the September 11, 2012 terrorist attacks in Benghazi, Libya said that Democratic presidential candidate former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton “ought to be wearing stripes” and “My son is dead because of her” on Monday’s “Varney & Co.” on the Fox Business Network.

Smith said, “My feeling is that she went on TV afterwards, telling everybody that I was the liar, that there’s someone here that is lying, and it wasn’t her, and that I was liar. I want her to apologize to me for calling me a liar on TV, because this is clearly not true. And I want to know why my son was left to die breathing in diesel smoke, which is the most horrible way to die, and she didn’t do anything to stop it. She could have.”

Smith added that Hillary “ought to be in — she ought to be wearing stripes. I want to see this woman in stripes, because she lied, and the different things that she did say, were very, totally wrong. My son is dead because of her. I would like to talk to her, even though I know I would be the bad one in that.”

Smith also stated that she hadn’t been contacted by anyone to do media appearances “other than local radio stations and Fox stations, and I’ve talked to them.”

Follow Ian Hanchett on Twitter @IanHanchett

Read More Stories About:
Breitbart TV, 2016 Presidential Race, Hillary Clinton, Benghazi, Sean Smith, Patricia Smith
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 48024
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 72
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.6forum.info

Back to top Go down

Re: ABOUT BENGHAZI

Post  Admin on Tue 22 Mar 2016, 12:42 am

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2012/11/06/whos-to-blame-for-benghazi-a-laymans-guide/
Who\u2019s to blame for Benghazi? A layman\u2019s guide
By Max Fisher November 6, 2012 
 
An empty shell casing in the U.S. consulate compound in Benghazi. (Gianluigi  Guercia/AFP/Getty Images)
The Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi killed four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens, raised questions about the stability of post-Gaddafi Libya, and ultimately became a major political controversy in the weeks ahead of Tuesday's U.S. presidential election. The political debate around Benghazi has often turned on an implicit (and sometimes quite explicit) question: Who messed up? That question hasn't been easy to follow, both because of the slow trickle of information about the incident and because so much of the domestic conversation has been colored by its political implications.

This is an attempt to objectively consider the various individuals and groups connected to the Benghazi incident, what's been publicly reported about their roles so far, and what that information suggests about their potential responsibility.

Because the picture of what actually happened before, during and after the attack is so incomplete and hazy, these appraisals are necessarily speculative and should be taken with a grain of salt. Rather than a definitive determination of fault, they should be considered estimations based on the publicly available information \u2013 a picture that could change dramatically as new information comes out. Still, taken together, they show both how widely dispersed the blame could be and how relatively minor, individual mistakes may have added up to something larger.

State Department: A mid-level denial to boost security

A mid-level official at the State Department had denied requests for a handful of additional security officers at the Benghazi consulate, despite a marked uptick in violence and the shortcomings of Libyan security forces. Warning signs, including a June bombing outside the consulate, did not appear to lead the department to beef up security. The largest request was for 12 additional men; there were five at the time of the attack. The State Department necessarily relies on its host government for security, and maybe in this case the CIA as well, although ultimate responsibility for State Department security would seem to rest with the agency itself. There's no evidence that the security requests went higher than the mid-level official.
Central Intelligence Agency: 'Emergency security' couldn't save ambassador 

The consulate in Benghazi had a secret arrangement with nearby CIA forces that were to provide "emergency security." The Wall Street Journal said in reporting the arrangement: "The CIA\u2019s secret role helps explain why security appeared inadequate at the U.S. diplomatic facility." A seven-person CIA security force responded within 50 minutes of the initial attack but, in the chaos of the battle, did not retrieve the ambassador. A number of observers have raised the obvious question of why the CIA did not see this attack coming, given its apparent scale. It's worth noting that Libya is awash in small arms and militias, which would seem to make monitoring them unusually difficult.

Pentagon: Quick-reaction force wasn't ready 

A New York Times report on the Pentagon's Africa command found that "forces in the region had not been adequately reconfigured" to respond to the attack. The Africa command AFRICOM, formed in 2007 and responsible for all U.S. military in Africa, is still developing its quick-reaction force and had to "borrow" one based in Europe. "Critics say there has been a gap in the command\u2019s quick-reaction capability, which the force would have helped fill," according to the Times. Still, the force would have been based in Sicily, so it's doubtful the troops would have been able to arrive in time to defend against the initial assault.

Ambassador Chris Stevens: Stayed in town despite seeing risk 

As Foreign Policy's Blake Hounshell put it, "Nobody wants to say it, but Amb. Chris Stevens was a big boy and he made his own decision to go to Benghazi despite the risks. If he thought it was too dangerous, he should not have gone." And he had a reputation for jogging Libya's streets despite security threats. Still, Stevens clearly sought greater security in Benghazi from local and national Libyan officials. It's not clear whether or not he made similar appeals to U.S. officials, but he seemed to take the security situation seriously.

February 17 Brigade: Hired to defend consulate, unreachable during the attack 

This Libyan militia, the most powerful security force in post-Gaddafi Benghazi, was officially designated to guard the consulate, fulfilling the Libyan state's responsibility. Stevens had made appeals to local and national Libyan officials complaining that their Libyan security was insufficient, reflecting concerns that February 17 wasn't up to the task. On the night of the attack, the CIA urgently tried and failed to raise the militiamen. That's a big deal, suggesting a degree of irresponsibility and/or incompetence. (There's no indication of malicious intent.) Still, given that this is a citizen militia fulfilling a role usually played by a country's military or domestic security services, how did its disappointing performance take U.S. agencies by quite such surprise?

Libyan government: Struggling to provide basic security

The Vienna Convention requires host countries to assume responsibility for foreign diplomatic buildings. Libya, it seems, was just not up to the task. Michael Birnbaum found officials and agencies "on autopilot as the new lawmakers plot alliances and betrayals over endless cups of coffee in Tripoli." Stevens had protested to senior officials that Benghazi's security was insufficient, although given that the consulate was relying on a citizen militia, it's not clear what Tripoli could have done. After four decades of dictatorship and the recent civil war, the central state just does not yet have a hold on basic security functions. Still, as with February 17, one question is whether or not the U.S. agencies should have been able to foresee these shortcomings.

Congressional Republicans: A 10 percent security budget cut

Some critics, including Vice President Biden, have noted that the GOP-led House of Representatives reduced appropriations for embassy security, which ultimately came to about 90 percent of what the administration requested, a drop of $270 million. Still, assuming that the cuts were proportional, it's hard to see this being decisive. Returning the funding to the full amount would have increased the number of dollars by only 10 percent; boosting the Benghazi security by 10 percent (from five guards to five and a half?) seems unlikely to have turned the tide.

President Obama, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, CIA Director David Petraeus

The details of bureaucratic infighting over consulate security might seem enormously significant now that they have undergone such public scrutiny, but it's very difficult to imagine those disputes reaching top U.S. leaders beforehand. The U.S. has 200-plus embassies and consulates abroad; their security requests are not cabinet-level decisions. Barring some extraordinary revelation, the strongest case for top-level responsibility is that these people oversee the people who oversee the people who made the decisions about security in Benghazi. That's not nothing, but it's not exactly the next Iran-Contra affair, either.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 48024
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 72
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.6forum.info

Back to top Go down

Re: ABOUT BENGHAZI

Post  Admin on Thu 03 Mar 2016, 9:23 pm

http://www.worldnewspolitics.com/2016/03/02/breaking-1-hillary-email-showed-terrorists-how-to-kill-amb-chris-stevens/
BREAKING: 1 HILLARY EMAIL SHOWED TERRORISTS HOW TO KILL AMB. CHRIS STEVENS [VIDEO]
MARCH 2, 2016
One of Hillary’s emails that was released on Monday pertaining to the Benghazi investigation that was part of her private email server contained a detailed location of murdered Ambassador Chris Stevens, which raised the possibility that terrorists could have intercepted the message.

Breitbart revealed that the email from April 10th, 2011, the State Department employee, Timmy Davis, forwarded an email to the server by Clinton’s aide, Huma Abedin.

Davis’ email read:

“The situation in Ajdabiyah has worsened to the point where Stevens is considering departure from Benghazi”

“The envoy’s delegation is currently doing a phased checkout (paying the hotel bills, moving some comms to the boat, etc). He will monitor the situation to see if it deteriorates further, but no decision has been made on departure. He will wait 2-3 more hours, then revisit the decision on departure.”

 

This is the last one of a chain of emails that contained Ambassador Stevens’ location and was almost readily available to anyone that could reach access to Clintons’ unsecured private email server.

Another email from March, 2011 stated:

“The current game plan is for Mr. Stevens to move no later than Wednesday from Malta to Benghazi. He will stage offshore initially for a one day visit during which he will have meetings with TNC (Transitional National Council) interlocutors and get a sense of the situation on the ground. The goal of this one day trip is for him to lay the groundwork for a stay of up to 30 days.”

Then, on April 8, another email reported that the “security situation in Benghazi remains quiet. Chris Stevens & team are in the hotel, moving only for meetings as required.”

On April 22, another email detailing Stevens’ travel plans: “I want to let you know about a temporary rotation in Benghazi. TNC Envoy Chris Stevens has been on the road since March 13, when he began his outreach mission, and has been in Benghazi since April 5.”

There was another email that had detailed information on Stevens’ plans, from April 22nd:

“I want to let you know about a temporary rotation in Benghazi. TNC Envoy Chris Stevens has been on the road since March 13, when he began his outreach mission, and has been in Benghazi since April 5.”

And then, on April 24, there was an email which told the exact time Ambassador Stevens would be having a meeting:

“Stevens will be meeting with MFA in one hour and will make a written request for better security at the hotel and for better security-related coordination. He still feels comfortable in the hotel. They are looking into the idea of moving into a villa, but that is some way off.”

Things will probably never be clear and we may never know whether terrorists could see the contents of Hillary’s non-secure server, especially given the amount of work she put in to keep them buried.

To make things worse, Hillary Clinton doesn’t care. She’s willing to put her own electoral chances above the lives of four Americans, including a U.S. ambassador.

Remembering Chris Stevens
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZtVcDXZBm8

And, in the end, the Democrats choice is this woman, imagine that! Okay America, it’s time to stand up and say no!

Share the story if you agree!
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 48024
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 72
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.6forum.info

Back to top Go down

Re: ABOUT BENGHAZI

Post  Admin on Wed 20 May 2015, 5:41 pm

It’s Now Clear The Stunning Negligence That Led Up To Chris Stevens’ Death In Benghazi
Two smoking guns hit the news streams this week: The U.S. indeed had a gun-running program pipelining Libyan weapons to Syrian rebels through a port in Benghazi; and at least some “intelligence” on action in Libya passed through not one, but at least two of Hillary Clinton’s “homebrew” email addresses.

It’s Clinton’s reliance on her civilian email servers for seemingly classified communications (indeed, all Department of State communications), coupled with the real nature of the mission in Benghazi, that lay bare the negligence leading up to the attack that took the lives of four Americans, including Amb. Chris Stevens and two former Navy SEALs.

In the November following the attack, The Wall Street Journal reported that the U.S. mission in Benghazi was “at it’s heart, a CIA operation.” It turns out the CIA Annex that had its cover blown during the attack was more than likely the central hub of an international gun running operation.
A source told Fox News two weeks after the attack that Stevens was in Benghazi meeting a Turkish diplomat to “negotiate a weapons transfer, in an effort to get SA-7 missiles out of the hands of violent extremists.” One hour after Stevens showed him the door, local Libyan guards “abandoned their posts” and the assault began.

We know that Moammar Gadhafi’s stockpile of SA-7 man-portable surface-to-air missiles concerned Western intelligence agencies, so much so that they quickly set up programs to locate and supposedly destroy these weapons in Libya. We also know that these weapons had, since Gadhafi’s fall, appeared in Mali in the hands of members of al-Qaida in the Islamic Meghreb through somewhat shady weapons deals.

So the alleged purpose of the CIA Annex was to rob extremist Peter of his heavy weapons and deliver the weapons to Syrian rebel Paul, putting the agency in direct competition with the same militia that attacked the consulate.

Perhaps coincidentally, some of the concern about the SA-7 market came through in emails to Clinton from Sidney Blumenthal. We already know how easily hackers scooped his information.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 48024
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 72
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.6forum.info

Back to top Go down

ABOUT BENGHAZI

Post  Admin on Mon 18 May 2015, 9:44 pm

Obama Admin knew Benghazi Attack Planned in Advance to Coincide With 9/11 Anniversary 

Obama used the attack on Benghazi to attack the First Amendment. Obama knew a 9/11 attack was in the works. Obama left our people there to die.
VIDEO
US intel knew about weapons going from Benghazi to Syria.


May 18, 2015 – 3:13 – Documents also reveal Defense Intelligence Agency predicted rise of ISIS.

Breaking news from Fox on Benghazi: CIA knew an attack against the USA Consulate was in the works ten-days before it happened. Nothing whatsoever to do with a “video” or any other red herring concocted by Obama and Hillary. Extra: Evidence builds that US intel knew about weapons going from Benghazi to Syria. (thanks to Dan F)
benghazi_burning_reuters
FOX News
Fox News has obtained documents which reveal what U.S. intelligence agencies knew about the Benghazi attack and weapons traveling from Libya to Syria back in 2012.

Catherine Herridge reported this morning on “America’s Newsroom” that a Defense Intelligence Agency memo from Sept. 16, 2012, concluded that the Benghazi terror attack was planned at least 10 days in advance to coincide with 9/11 and was in retaliation for a drone strike that killed an al Qaeda strategist. The memo was copied to the National Security Council, the State Department and the CIA.

“The intention was to attack the consulate and to kill as many Americans as possible to seek revenge for the [U.S.] killing of Aboyahiye (Alaliby) in Pakistan and in memorial of the 11 September 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center buildings,” the memo said.
Judicial Watch obtained the memos by suing in federal court.

The Obama administration says it was a coincidence that [the Benghazi attack] occurred on 9/11. In fact, their intelligence said it wasn’t a coincidence, and in fact, specifically the attack occurred because it was 9/11,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said.

Another 2012 DIA memo predicts the rise of ISIS and the establishment of a caliphate 17 months before President Barack Obama called ISIS “jay-vee.”
A third DIA memo, dated Oct. 5, 2012, leaves no doubt that U.S. intelligence agencies knew that weapons were moving from Libya to Syria before the attack that killed four Americans.
Former CIA Director Mike Morell recently dodged questions about these weapons in an interview with Bret Baier.
Baier asked him: Were CIA officers tracking the movement of weapons from Libya to Syria?
“Can’t talk about it,” Morell said.
- See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2015/05/obama-admin-knew-benghazi-attack-planned-in-advance-to-coincide-with-911-anniversary.html/#sthash.ecmiiKyE.dpuf
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 48024
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 72
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.6forum.info

Back to top Go down

Re: ABOUT BENGHAZI

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum