Who is online?
In total there are 9 users online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 9 Guests :: 2 Bots

None

[ View the whole list ]


Most users ever online was 111 on Thu 12 Dec 2013, 2:28 am
Latest topics
» EVIDENCE FOR THE RESURRECTION
Today at 12:12 am by the_sign

» Delrifkah: HEBREW SAGE MIGHT SAY.
Yesterday at 9:07 pm by Admin

» ISRAEL BREAKING NEWS
Yesterday at 8:56 pm by Admin

» NUGGET Today's Devotional
Yesterday at 8:48 pm by Admin

» +Dev+ Michael D. Inman
Yesterday at 8:22 pm by Admin

» HEAVEN LETTERS
Yesterday at 7:55 pm by Admin

» Mrs. P's Haven of Refuge Inspirational
Yesterday at 7:14 pm by Admin

» WORTHY NEWS
Yesterday at 7:09 pm by Admin

» Daily Disciples
Yesterday at 7:08 pm by Admin

» WORLD ISRAEL NEWS
Thu 19 Apr 2018, 11:25 pm by Admin

» Meditation Chip Brogden
Thu 19 Apr 2018, 9:21 pm by Admin

» ENDTIME HEADLINES
Thu 19 Apr 2018, 1:11 pm by Admin

» AISH
Thu 19 Apr 2018, 12:53 pm by Admin

» Iraqi air forces carry out strikes on ISIS positions in Syria
Thu 19 Apr 2018, 12:27 pm by Admin

» Can A Nation Be Born In A Day? Celebrating Israel’s Independence Day
Thu 19 Apr 2018, 10:43 am by Admin

» THE CLARION PROJECT
Thu 19 Apr 2018, 9:45 am by Admin

» CHRISTIAN NEWS NETWORK
Wed 18 Apr 2018, 9:39 pm by Admin

»  HONEST REPORTING Defending Israel from Media Bias plz read REGULAR UPDATES
Wed 18 Apr 2018, 9:06 pm by Admin

» ISRAEL VIDEO'S
Wed 18 Apr 2018, 11:54 am by Admin

» BREITBART NEWS
Wed 18 Apr 2018, 11:15 am by Admin

Navigation
 Portal
 Index
 Memberlist
 Profile
 FAQ
 Search

ABOUT BENGHAZI

Page 1 of 2 1, 2  Next

Go down

Re: ABOUT BENGHAZI

Post  Admin on Tue 20 Mar 2018, 9:33 pm

https://www.usapoliticstoday.org/benghazi-reveals-comey-mccabes-fbi/
Benghazi Hero Drops Jaws, Reveals What Comey and McCabe’s FBI Did to Him
By Gary Maher - March 20, 2018053
When it was announced Friday evening that former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe had been fired on the recommendation of both the Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General and the FBI’s Office of Professional Responsibility, there were plenty of “hot takes” from politicians and media figures on both the right and left.

However, according to BizPac Review, the hottest take of all in regard to McCabe’s termination may have come from one of the heroes who emerged from the deadly 2012 Benghazi terrorist attack, Kris “Tanto” Paronto.

Paronto, a former U.S. Army Ranger who was a security contractor in Benghazi at the time of the attack and helped fend off repeated waves of assaults by terrorists at the U.S. consulate and nearby CIA annex, took to Twitter to make his feelings known in regard to McCabe, as well as former FBI Director James Comey and former CIA Director John Brennan.

He began with a tweet which eviscerated McCabe’s rebuttal claiming he had been “singled out” in an effort to “slander” him and the FBI in general by President Donald Trump and his administration.

Paronto tweeted, “Slander the FBI and Law Enforcement?! You’ve got to be s—-ing me Andy. You, James and your @BarackObama appointed syndicate brought nothing but lies, politics, corruption & disgrace to a once great FBI. @Comey #AndrewMcCabe #LockThemUp.”

 
Kris Paronto
@KrisParonto
Slander the @FBI and Law Enforcement?! You’ve got to be shitting me Andy. You , James and your @BarackObama appointed syndicate brought nothing but lies, politics, corruption&disgrace to a once great FBI. @Comey #AndrewMcCabe #LockThemUp

8:51 PM - Mar 17, 2018
1,719
867 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
But it was the tweet he sent immediately following that which really garnered attention, as he appeared to indicate that partisan members of the FBI attempted to slap him and the other team members from Benghazi with excessive use of force charges, presumably in relation to their use of deadly force to defend the consulate and CIA annex from repeated attacks.

 
Kris Paronto
@KrisParonto
By the way, as you’re on your way out I want to thank you, James and your @HillaryClinton supporting hacks at the @FBI for trying to pin excessive force  use on myself and my team after coming home from Benghazi. You all are the worst scum of human.  @Comey
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 51194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 72
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.6forum.info

Back to top Go down

Re: ABOUT BENGHAZI

Post  Admin on Thu 01 Mar 2018, 7:18 pm

Ambassador killed in Benghazi attack considered leaving Libya in April 2011, emails reveal
2016-03-01 | Fox News
Seventeen months before he was killed in the Sept. 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, Ambassador Chris Stevens was seriously considering leaving the country as its civil war widened. 

The ambassador's concerns are reflected in emails sent to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's inner circle. The emails were released by the State Department Monday as part of the 14th and final batch of messages from Clinton's private server.

One email in particular, dated April 10, 2011, relays Stevens' safety concerns to the State Department. It was sent by a State Department official named Timmy Davis to several key Clinton aides, including Jake Sullivan, now the top foreign policy adviser on Clinton's presidential campaign, and Huma Abedin.

The message, with the subject line "Stevens update" reads, in part, "The situation in Ajdabiyah [a town approximately 90 miles southeast of Benghazi] has worsened to the point where Stevens is considering departure from Benghazi. The envoy's delegation is currently doing a phased checkout (paying the hotel bills, moving some comms to the boat, etc) ... He will wait 2-3 more hours, then revisit the decision on departure."

Read the whole story here.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/03/01/ambassador-killed-in-benghazi-attack-considered-leaving-libya-in-april-2011-emails-reveal.html?intcmp=hpbt2
Published March 01, 2016  Fox News
VIDEO 
Seventeen months before he was killed in the Sept. 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, Ambassador Chris Stevens was seriously considering leaving the country as its civil war widened. 

The ambassador's concerns are reflected in emails sent to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's inner circle. The emails were released by the State Department Monday as part of the 14th and final batch of messages from Clinton's private server.

One email in particular, dated April 10, 2011, relays Stevens' safety concerns to the State Department. It was sent by a State Department official named Timmy Davis to several key Clinton aides, including Jake Sullivan, now the top foreign policy adviser on Clinton's presidential campaign, and Huma Abedin.

The message, with the subject line "Stevens update" reads, in part, "The situation in Ajdabiyah [a town approximately 90 miles southeast of Benghazi] has worsened to the point where Stevens is considering departure from Benghazi. The envoy's delegation is currently doing a phased checkout (paying the hotel bills, moving some comms to the boat, etc) ... He will wait 2-3 more hours, then revisit the decision on departure."

The message from Davis indicates there is heavy sniper fire and shelling in Ajdabiyah. According to the message, Stevens is apparently trying to see if “this is an irreversible situation. Departure would send a significant political signal” that the U.S. had lost confidence in Libya's Transitional National Council, which oversaw the rebel forces fighting to overthrow dictator Muammar Qaddafi. 

Davis' message was forwarded to Clinton by Abedin. The secretary of state's response is not known.

The latest email release also indicates that State Department official Wendy Sherman sent at least one classified email to Clinton in August 2012. The email, which Sherman sent with the attached message, "I don't usually forward emails such as below", dealt with Egyptian troop movements. 

Sherman, who left the State Department this past October, led the U.S. delegation at last summer's nuclear talks with Iran. Fox News previously reported that Sherman appears in a 2013 State Department video saying that in the interest of speed, Clinton and her aides shared information that "would never be on an unclassified system" normally.

Another revelation in the latest email dump is that Clinton confidant Sidney Blumenthal urged Clinton to approve the showing of Usama bin Laden's death photos to members of Congress after the Al Qaeda leader was killed by Navy SEALs in May 2011. 

In an email to Clinton, Blumenthal argued that the photos would provide a boost to President Obama's political capital ahead of that summer's lengthy debt ceiling fight with the Republican-controlled House of Representatives. 

"Having the members file through [a special secure room] will provide testimony to the President's feat," Blumenthal wrote in the May 5, 2011 message. "They will be not only be acknowledging but also enhancing his power. They will in effect become liegemen bowing before him, but not in any way they will resent or will protest. They will serve as witnesses to the magnitude of what he has done."

Members of Senate and House committees who deal with intelligence and military matters were later invited to view the photos, but they have not been made public.

State Department spokesman John Kirby told reporters Monday that one additional email between Clinton and Obama was withheld from the final batch of messages, bringing the total number of such messages to 19.

Kirby also said that 52,000 pages of emails, not 55,000 as previously stated, have been released to the public from Clinton's private server, which was kept in her bathroom in her Chappaqua, N.Y. home. Kirby said 55,000 was a "colloquial" term used previously by the State Department and the real number of pages is between 52 or 53,000.

Fox News' Lucas Tomlinson and Chad Pergram contributed to this report.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 51194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 72
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.6forum.info

Back to top Go down

Re: ABOUT BENGHAZI

Post  Admin on Wed 28 Feb 2018, 3:19 pm

Look What Clinton Just Did to Marine Who Accused Hillary of ‘Covering Up’ Benghazi…
https://www.allenwest.com/2016/02/27/look-what-clinton-just-did-to-marine-who-accused-hillary-of-covering-up-benghazi/
By Editorial Staff - February 27, 2016
Despite her “victorious” 11 hours of testimony last fall, very few Americans who are awake feel anything at all has been cleared up on the tragedy that was Benghazi. Except perhaps that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is, quite literally, getting away with murder.

So it’s not really surprising that Americans — and members of our military especially — would continue to demand answers from the Clintons. The answers that, somehow, our government’s “due process” failed to deliver.

What is surprising, however, is how such a questioner from our military is treated — not just by the Clintons themselves, but by their fellow Americans whom they serve.

Via Fox News:

A man was removed Friday by police officers from a Hillary Clinton campaign rally in South Carolina, after raising questions with husband and former President Bill Clinton about his wife’s role in the Benghazi terror attacks.

“Four (Americans) were killed and your wife is trying to cover it up,” said the protester, who said he’s a Marine sergeant and eight-year, active-duty veteran.

Hillary Clinton was secretary of state during the Sept. 11, 2012 terror attacks on a U.S. outpost in Benghazi, Libya, in which U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans were killed.

Families of the victims say Clinton told them in the immediate aftermath of the attacks that the strikes were inspired by an online, anti-Islamic video. Clinton’s emails show she knew within hours of the strikes that they were terror related.

“I heard you,” Bill Clinton said at the rally in Bluffton, S.C., in an effort to respond to the protestor, over cheer and boos and before sheriff deputies removed him. “You listen to me now.”

The Marine never did get an answer before he was forcibly removed.

Watch for yourself — and take note of the boos this questioner is receiving from the crowd of Clinton supporters:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=172&v=TXypM__frpI

Clinton needs “to take responsibility for dropping the ball,” the Marine told the Island Packet/Beaufort Gazette outside the venue, after being removed. “The fact that she is not in prison now is mind-blowing.”

What’s equally mind-blowing is that so many Americans not only continue to support Hillary Clinton, they blindly defend her from such despicable actions. While Bill Clinton suggests the Marine’s mind has been “poisoned by lies,” it’s actually these Clintonbot supporters whose minds have been poisoned by lies — and willingly allow our so-called leaders to not only leave our men to die in Benghazi, but continue to boldly and shamelessly lie about it.

[Note: This article was written by Michelle Jesse, Associate Editor]


Marine Sgt. calls Hillary out over Benghazi 'FOUR'-Bill Clinton rally 2016-American Patriots III%
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=172&v=TXypM__frpI&ab_channel=MoniqueMarie
Video Transcript: 

ORIGINAL VIDEO...ALL OTHERS WILL BE REPORTED-----------To MEDIA: Message me here:   https://www.facebook.com/Monique-Mari... ------ *******All PATRIOTS across the Country, Please go to the Rallys and Hold the CLINTONS ACCOUNTABLE****** 

First I would like to thank the Beaufort County Sheriff's Deputies for their Courteous and Respectful handling of this situation. They were doing their jobs. If anyone posts HATE or Violence against the Law Enforcement, they will immediately be removed and blocked from channel. 

For anyone interested in the TRUTH of what we stand for, listen to the podcast........ http://www.apiiination.com/blog/podca...

WE WERE NOT ASKING QUESTIONS. WE WERE THERE TO GET A MESSAGE ACROSS.

When Bill Clinton visited Bluffton, SC to rally people to vote for Hillary, he met the ire of a former Marine Drill Sgt. who spoke out against Hillary's lies surrounding the Benghazi Four. WE WERE NOT ASKING QUESTIONS, but Bill kept trying to turn it into a Q&A.  

Our message was that Hillary has no right to run for President.  Hillary Lied to the Families of the Benghazi Four-Stevens, Woods, Smith, & Doherty. She lied over the American Flag-draped coffins of our Brave Men. 

Hillary deserves to spend the rest of her life in prison for that alone.  Yet her crimes encompass so much more....Watergate, Chinagate, Emailgate (this alone should have her convicted for using unsecured servers during her first three months tenure as Secretary of State.  There is so much more Hillary is guilty of, but her LIES and arrogance surrounding the Benghazi Four is enough to have her incarcerated for life.-----AMERICAN PATRIOTS III%

     

******"THE ONLY THING NECESSARY FOR THE TRIUMPH OF EVIL IS FOR GOOD MEN TO DO NOTHING."--EDMUND BURKE******

***********************************************************************************************************************************

***Side Note:  Some ignorant and jealous lowlifes keep posting about an Incident that occurred between this Marine Sgt., who is a former Drill Instructor at Parris Island, SC, and another former Drill Instructor SGTMAJ Archie.  SGTMAJ Archie had seen this particular Marine Sgt. protesting the Bergdahl exchange for 5 top taliban commanders/Terrorists and he did not agree that he should have been wearing his Cover (Marine Drill Instructor's hat). Now, this is a matter of opinion, right or wrong, it is opinion. The two disagreed on this subject over a heated argument on the phone the night before we went to protest on the road leading to Parris Island. When we arrived, media was already there as well as the Sheriff's Deputy (to maintain order and keep the peace) and SGTMAJ Archie was waiting at the Parris Island gait.  It was not long that SGTMAJ Archie drove off base, jumped out of his jeep where he began yelling at the Marine Sgt. for wearing his Cover. During this argument between two bellowing Drill Instructors SGTMAJ Archie pushed into the other Marine Sgt. with his head and knocked the Cover off of his head, he then picked it up and said he would throw it in the trash and drove off with it. 
The Sheriff's Deputy had to get the Cover back and charges were pressed for assault yet later dropped. SGTMAJ Archie was FORCED to retire. NOW. There are those who blame the Marine Sgt. for SGTMAJ Archie being forced to retire  because they do not believe he should have been wearing his Cover, though there is no law stating that he cannot. It is opinion as many others say he has the right to wear his Cover.  

Now, I find it sad that SGTMAJ Archie claims absolutely no responsibility for his actions that day and his supporters continue to attack the Marine Sgt. for SGTMAJ Archie being FORCED to retire.  The Marine Sgt. DID NOT FORCE SGTMAJ Archie to wait for us to arrive after the argument the night before and knowing there would be further disagreement in front of the media and the Sheriff's Deputy. The Marine Sgt. DID NOT FORCE SGTMAJ Archie to drive off base to confront him.  It would take a Mighty Powerful Man to FORCE SGTMAJ Archie to do anything. When does a man take RESPONSIBILITY for his own actions? It is sad and pathetic that the blame is placed on the Marine Sgt. for SGTMAJ Archie's actions that day. 

The problem with all of this, is that the BIGGER PICTURE is lost. The MESSAGE of the Protest is Lost when you have all of the petty bickering. Bergdahl, a Traitor, was traded for 5 taliban commanders/terrorists. and now our message  is that Hillary Clinton should NOT be running for President, but sitting in Prison for the rest of her life for all of her LIES and CRIMES.  I post this because many keep posting and attacking and I am setting the record straight.


Putting away the softballs, Univision’s Jorge Ramos brought what’s been missing during Democrat debates, hard hitting questions.

JORGE RAMOS: On the night of the attacks in Benghazi, you sent an email to your daughter Chelsea saying, that an al-Qaeda-like group was responsible for the killing of the Americans. However, some of the families claim that you lied to them. Secretary Clinton, did you lie to them?

Just to refresh, here’s Hillary Clinton’s and President Obama’s story.

HILLARY CLINTON: We’ve seen rage and violence directed at American embassies over an awful internet video that we had nothing to do with. 

OBAMA: As a crude and disgusting video sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world. Now I have made it clear that the United States government had nothing to do with this video.

The problem is, they both knew it wasn’t the video. Hillary Clinton said so in her own email.

JIM JORDAN: You’re looking at an email you sent to your family. Here’s what you said, at 11 o’clock that night - approximately one hour after you told the American people it was a video you say to your family, “Two officers were killed today in Benghazi by an al-Qaeda-like group.” Most significantly, the next day within 24 hours, you had a conversation with the Egyptian Prime Minister. You told him this, “We know the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the film. It was a planned attack - not a protest.”

So what did Mrs. Clinton have to say about being called a liar by a Benghazi victim’s mother, Patrica Smith?

CLINTON: You know, look, I feel a great deal of sympathy for the families of the four brave Americans that we lost at Benghazi. And certainly I can’t even imagine the grief that she has for losing her son. But she’s wrong. She’s absolutely wrong. At the time I emailed with my daughter, a terrorist group had taken credit for the attacks on our facility in Benghazi.

Hang on, let’s take that back.

JORDAN: We know, not we think, not it might be, we know the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the film. It was a planned attack - not a protest.

CLINTON: Within 16, 18 hours, they rescinded taking credit. They did it all on social media. And the video did play a role. We have captured one of the lead terrorists and he admits it was both a terrorist attack and it was influenced by the video.

So which is it? First you say it was from a video, but in an email you claim it was a planned attack. Now it’s both? Do you trust Hillary Clinton?

JORDAN: State Department experts knew the truth. You knew the truth. But that’s not what the American people got.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 51194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 72
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.6forum.info

Back to top Go down

Re: ABOUT BENGHAZI

Post  Admin on Tue 06 Feb 2018, 7:25 pm

WATCH: What Hillary Clinton Just Said About Women and ‘Climate Change’ Has America GAGGING
https://www.usapoliticstoday.org/watch-hillary-clinton-just-said-women-climate-change-america-gagging/
By Zack Jefferson - February 6, 20180146
Hillary Clinton just can’t help herself.

She’s so far left she can’t see straight.
According to the twice-failed presidential candidate, ‘women will be primarily burdened by climate change.’
In a nutshell, “global warming” is racist.
From LifeZette:

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton predicted Monday during a human rights event at Georgetown University that climate change will force women to “bear the brunt of looking for the food, looking for the firewood, looking for the place to migrate to …”
Such migration won’t be led by men, she maintained, but rather by women “when all of the grass is finally gone as the desertification moves south and you have to keep moving your livestock or your crops are no longer growing.”

More from Daily Caller:

“So yes, women once again, will be the primary…primarily burdened with the problems of climate change.”

At this same event at Georgetown University, Clinton complained of the sexism and misogyny she believed influenced Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign.

“Some of it was old fashioned sexism and a refusal to accept the equality of women and certainly the equality of women’s leadership,” she said. “And some of it as an outgrowth of all of this anxiety and insecurity that is playing on people and leading them in a hunt for scapegoats.”
This woman is PATHETIC!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RlVlm5UxwrY
.
Breaking News: Clintons Have Been Using the FBI Against Their Enemies for Years
https://www.usapoliticstoday.org/clintons-fbi-agents-enemies-years/
By Gary Maher - February 6, 20180156
It has all the elements of a polarizing scandal, with none other than Hillary Clinton at center stage — plus highly sensitive confidential documents, unexplained actions involving the FBI, and allegations that federal investigators were weaponized for partisan political purposes.

No, this is not the infamous Christopher Steele dossier containing multiple allegations about Donald Trump’s relationships with shadowy Russian business tycoons and spies. Nor is it about the Steele dossier’s deceitful use by rogue FBI executives to put campaign operatives for the 2016 Republican presidential nominee under official surveillance.

That Hillary Clinton/FBI scandal began just last year.

The Hillary Clinton/FBI scandal described in the lead paragraph above began in 1993, only months after she and husband Bill began what turned out to be an eight-year residency in the White House. You see, Bill and Hillary Clinton’s use of the FBI for political gain is nothing new.

Here’s how the Weekly Standard summarized the Clintons’ 1993 “Filegate” scandal when it became the focus of a special counsel investigation in 1996:

The good news is that Whitewater special counsel Kenneth Starr is now looking into the circumstances under which the Clinton White House improperly secured and reviewed highly confidential background information from the FBI on more than 400 Reagan- and Bush-administration employees. A full accounting of this atrocious invasion of privacy may eventually become public.

But the bad news is that, in the meantime, the whole story is being set up to disappear. A separate FBI analysis of the “Filegate” caper has now been released. It is highly critical of the entire enterprise — which seems to have victimized 71 more individuals than had previously been identified.

But the FBI inquiry does not address the question of White House conduct. Were Clinton’s aides on a dirt-digging expedition? Those aides continue to maintain, in the president’s words, that ‘it was just an innocent bureaucratic snafu’: computer glitches and procedural carelessness, with no malign intent and no disclosure of personal information.

In short: no harm, no foul.

That’s long been the Clinton pattern — laws bent, broken or ignored, political opponents smeared, self-righteous protests of innocence when exposed, trusting supporters used and abused, and endless obfuscations, often punctuated by artless evasions, such as Hillary’s bemused response when asked by a reporter if she wiped her server clean: “What, like with a cloth or something?”

With the release Friday of the four-page “Nunes memo” — a summary of classified information obtained by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and composed by staffers for the panel’s chairman, Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) — one paragraph in particular stands out:

The dossier — compiled by Christopher Steele (Steele dossier) on behalf of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and the Hillary Clinton campaign — formed an essential part of the Carter Page FISA application. Steele was a longtime FBI source who was paid over $160,000 by the DNC and Clinton campaign, via the law firm Perkins Coie and research firm Fusion GPS, to obtain derogatory information on Donald Trump’s ties to Russia.

The dossier, described to Congress by then-FBI Director James Comey as “salacious and unverified,” was the foundational element in the specious narrative peddled by and through the mainstream media since the day after the 2016 election to explain Donald Trump’s astounding defeat of Hillary Clinton. Yeah, that’s the ticket. Trump got his Russian buddies to help him beat Hillary!

And even though an internal FBI unit described the dossier as “minimally corroborated,” the bureau still used it to obtain and maintain a warrant for turning the massive surveillance power of the federal government against private citizens working for — who else? — Trump.

Would that surveillance have happened without the dossier? Not according to then-deputy director of the FBI, Andrew McCabe, who, according to the Nunes memo, told Congress in December 2017 during closed testimony “that no surveillance warrant would have been sought from the [FISA] without the Steele dossier information.” As Comey might say, “That’s it?”

So there we have it yet again: Bill and Hillary Clinton manipulating the administrative, investigative and intelligence powers of the Washington Establishment to benefit themselves and discredit their opponents. Reasonable people wonder if this time the Clintons will, at long last, be held to account.
Remember in 1993 when 400 FBI confidential files on Reagan and Bush appointees turned up in the White House?
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 51194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 72
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.6forum.info

Back to top Go down

Re: ABOUT BENGHAZI

Post  Admin on Mon 29 Jan 2018, 12:35 am

Benghazi rocked by massive car bombs – 33 killed, 47+ wounded
January 24, 2018
https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/islam/islamic-terrorism/benghazi-car-bombs-attack.htm?utm_source=boomtrain&utm_medium=automated&utm_campaign=ci2&bt_alias=eyJ1c2VySWQiOiAiZWY0MGMwZDctYmU0Ni00YjlhLThhNGUtZWNlOTA1ODUyOTJjIn0%3D
Benghazi rocked by massive car bombs – 33 killed, 47+ wounded
Jordan Tan / Shutterstock.com
The infamous city of Benghazi, Libya, was hit with a terrorist attack on Wednesday that has left at least 33 people dead and 47 injured.

Two car bombs exploded near the Bait Radwan Mosque on Wednesday evening local time, the Chicago Tribune reported, the second of which was timed “to go off as residents and medics gathered to evacuate the wounded from the first blast, aiming to cause a maximum of casualties,” according to Benghazi police.

No terror group has explicitly claimed responsibility for this attack, though some are assigning blame to the remaining fragments of the Islamic State in the area.

Designed To Murder Many
The first of two car bombs exploded as worshippers were leaving the mosque after evening prayers, Reuters reported. It was 10-15 minutes after that when the next, more powerful, bomb detonated, after medics had already arrived.

“Many people were gathering and more people left the mosque when the second blast happened, and my brother died then,” Khaled Almajdoub told reporters. “He has four daughters, no political or religious affiliation and was just a small business owner.” Almajdoub said his brother was a mechanic.

Another individual killed in the first bombing was Ahmed Al-Fitur, who headed the Arrest and Special Investigation Unit of Dignity Operation, The Libya Observer reported.

Nations and international organizations condemned the attacks as war crimes, saying that any attacks that target civilians — either directly or indiscriminately — violate humanitarian laws. Egypt, a neighbor of Libya, asked that the international community “take a firm line on arms smuggling into Libya.”

Libya’s government, which is backed by the U.N., announced a three-day mourning period following the attacks.

A Nation In Chaos
After former leader Moammar Gadhafi was ousted in 2011, Libya descended into an ongoing civil war as rival governments were established in the eastern and western regions of the nation. The resulting chaotic conditions and economic crises created an opportunity for terrorist groups to gain a foothold in the area.

In 2012, the United States diplomatic compound in Benghazi was attacked by Islamic terrorists and resulted in the deaths of Ambassador Christopher Stevens, Foreign Service Information Management Officer Sean Smith, and CIA contractors Tyrone S. Woods and Glen Doherty.

Then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the administration of former President Barack Obama initially blamed the attacks on anger over an anti-Islam video on the Internet, but later admitted that the attack was pre-planned and carried out by a terrorist group.

While some may be tempted to overlook violence in terror-ridden countries like Libya, the deaths of innocents should never go unnoticed — no matter where they are. Our thoughts are with the victims of another senseless act of Islamic terror.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 51194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 72
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.6forum.info

Back to top Go down

Re: ABOUT BENGHAZI

Post  Admin on Wed 03 Jan 2018, 9:21 pm

Benghazi survivor unloads the truth: ‘Hillary and Obama left me… to die.’
January 1, 2018
https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/government-corruption/benghazi-survivor-unloads-truth.htm?utm_source=Boomtrain&utm_medium=manual&bt_alias=eyJ1c2VySWQiOiAiZWY0MGMwZDctYmU0Ni00YjlhLThhNGUtZWNlOTA1ODUyOTJjIn0%3D&utm_campaign=ci2
Benghazi survivor unloads the truth: ‘Hillary and Obama left me… to die.’
George Sheldon / Shutterstock.com
The attack on Benghazi in 2012 was more than a tragedy — it was a likely-criminal case of negligence on the part of then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the Barack Obama administration. The event, which was memorialized in the blockbuster hit 13 Hours, continues to be a contentious issue among Americans.

On New Year’s Eve, Benghazi survivor Kris Paronto reignited the controversy by tweeting that Clinton and Obama left him, his team, and 30 other Americans to die during the 13-hour, seemingly-pre-planned storming of the U.S. embassy in Libya.
Paronto’s tweet comes just a month after Ahmed Abu Khatallah, a key figure in the Benghazi terrorist attack, was found not guilty of murder.


Left to Die
It all started with a simple New Years greeting. Paronto wrote, “Happy New Year everyone! This is the time to put trouble and past mistakes behind you, but remember to learn from them so they’re not repeated, and start with a clean slate,” and thanked his followers for their support, sharing the post on Instagram and Twitter.

Baseball legend Curt Shilling, an avid Trump supporter, responded, tweeting his best wishes and encouragement to Paronto on Twitter on New Year’s Eve:

31 Dec

Kris Paronto
@KrisParonto
Happy New Year everyone
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 51194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 72
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.6forum.info

Back to top Go down

Re: ABOUT BENGHAZI

Post  Admin on Sat 25 Nov 2017, 10:12 pm

Clinton says she has no regrets about sleeping during Benghazi attack
November 24, 2017
https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/government-corruption/clinton-no-regrets-benghazi.htm?
Clinton says she has no regrets about sleeping during Benghazi attack
Lorie Shaull / CCL
Conservatives have blasted Hillary Clinton for years over her handling of the attack on Benghazi in September 2012, but now, the former secretary of state has let the cat out of the bag — and it’s worse than we expected.

Clinton told conservative radio show host Hugh Hewitt on Wednesday that she does not regret going home early to sleep during the Benghazi attack. 

While Clinton’s interview with Hewitt was part of her tour to promote her new memoir, What Happened, her nonchalance about the deadly Benghazi attacks isn’t a good look on her — and likely won’t earn her any new fans.

“I went home”
Clinton said she left the State Department around 9 or 10 p.m. on Sept. 11, 2012, during a briefing on the attacks three days later, when the department was still working to get Americans out of the area.

She told Hewitt that she headed back to the State Department early the next morning.

“You know, I was there until 9, 10 o’clock. We had done a number of what are called SVTCs, you know, satellite conferences,” Clinton said. “I had talked on the phone. I had talked over satellite with our team in Libya. I had talked with members of our government, Defense and Intel and others, obviously the White House.”

According to Clinton’s recollection, the U.S. government was doing everything in its power to rescue those Department of Defense and CIA personnel who were surrounded by hundreds of Islamist militants that night and the next day. But instead of ensuring that herself, she went home to sleep, she said:

You know, we knew that our goal was to find all of our people and get them out of there, and that was ongoing. And so you know, I went home for a few hours of sleep. I talked to the president, bringing him totally up to date, and then obviously, you know, headed back early the next morning.
In an interesting side note, Clinton’s admission that she went home and slept appears to contradict her earlier statements. According to Politifact:

For her part, Clinton has said in her memoir Hard Choices and in congressional testimony that she worked late into the night and did not sleep, though she did work from her Washington home for at least part of the night.
“I doubt it”
Would staying later have made a difference? Clinton argued: “I doubt it.”

Clinton further claimed that her critics were wrong to make the issue “political.”

She told Hewitt:

That was never the principal charge that the Republicans and others made against me, and those in the administration. So I don’t think that silenced the critics, because there seem to be a calculation that this was an issue that they could make political.
Counter Claims
Contrary to Clinton’s telling of the tale, many have claimed that the Benghazi attack, which left four Americans dead, could have been prevented.

Some evidence shows that American ambassador J. Christopher Stevens was worried about the poor security situation in Benghazi prior to the attack. Stevens and others worried that the CIA, which relied mostly on supposedly “friendly” militias, was a sitting duck in the middle of a firestorm.

Additionally, veterans of the battle, including those agents who repelled the failed Islamist takeover, have stated publicly that the State Department repeatedly told the CIA to stand down rather than rescue Ambassador Stevens and others.

Though we may never know the truth about Benghazi, one thing is for certain: to Hillary Clinton, it wasn’t that big of a deal.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 51194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 72
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.6forum.info

Back to top Go down

Re: ABOUT BENGHAZI

Post  Admin on Thu 23 Nov 2017, 10:41 pm

BOMBSHELL: Hillary Issues Sick Benghazi Announcement, She’s Disgusting
November 23, 2017 Jeff Charles 
Hillary Clinton continues to defend her role in the disaster that occurred in Benghazi, Libya.
https://www.christiannewsalerts.com/hillary-sick-benghazi-announcement/?
In an interview on the Hugh Hewitt Show, she discussed her book entitled “What Happened.” During the interview, she states that she does not believe that her leaving the State Department on the night of the attack in Benghazi contributed to the tragedy that claimed the life of a US ambassador.

Conservative radio talk show host Hugh Hewitt spoke with the former Secretary of State earlier this week. When asked whether or not her presence at the State Department on the night of the attack would have affected the outcome, she said,

“I doubt it, Hugh. I doubt it, because that was never the principal charge that the Republicans and others made against me, and those in the administration. So I don’t think that silenced the critics, because there seem to be a calculation that this was an issue that they could make political.”
On September 11, 2012, Islamic extremists attacked an American compound in Benghazi. The attack resulted in the deaths of four people, including Ambassador Christopher Stevens. In the months leading up to the attack, Stevens had repeatedly asked for more security measures to be implemented as violence was increasing in the area.

The State Department continually refused to grant Stevens’ request for extra security in the compound. Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI), who was the head of a congressional investigation into the attacks, said that the State Department “not only failed to honor repeated requests for additional security, but instead actually reduced security in Libya.”

When the attack occurred, the US military was unable to send troops into the area in time to rescue the ambassador and his companions. The deaths of these Americans could have been prevented had the State Department took their requests for security seriously. To make matters worse, the Obama administration was not truthful about the motivation behind the attack.

In the aftermath of the terrorists’ assault, the Obama administration claimed that the attack was a response to an offensive video about Islam on YouTube. They claimed the video enraged the terrorists, who decided to retaliate by attacking the compound.

That was a lie.

Subsequent investigations found that the attack had been planned for months. The attackers were not getting revenge for a video; they were carrying out a carefully-coordinated assault designed to kill the Americans working in the compound. Unfortunately, before the truth about the attack came out, the person who created the video was unfairly blamed for the attack.

Hillary Clinton admits to leaving her post during the attacks in Benghazi. Is this a new low for the former first lady?

Is this a new low for Hillary Clinton?

Yes
No
Next
It’s not surprising that Clinton is still defending her handling of the situation in Benghazi. It was one of the biggest blemishes on her political career, and it resulted in her resignation as Secretary of State.

The Benghazi disaster is also one of the reasons Clinton did not win the election. Her handling of the fiasco caused Americans to doubt her judgment and competence. The fact that she continues to make excuses for her mistakes likely discouraged voters from supporting her. Benghazi is another reminder that Clinton was not fit for the office of president.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 51194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 72
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.6forum.info

Back to top Go down

Re: ABOUT BENGHAZI

Post  Admin on Tue 31 Oct 2017, 10:32 pm

BREAKING: Massive Breakthrough in Benghazi Investigation
October 31, 2017
https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/islam/islamic-terrorism/massive-breakthrough-benghazi-investigation.htm?BREAKING: Massive Breakthrough in Benghazi Investigation
Image Source: Screenshot
Five years later, the men who died in Benghazi have not gone unavenged.

On Sunday, U.S. forces captured Mustafa al-Imam, a militant believed to be a key figure in Benghazi attack that killed U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans.

This morning, President Trump said in a statement:

To the families of these fallen heroes: I want you to know that your loved ones are not forgotten, and they will never be forgotten.
A Sudden Strike
U.S. forces captured al-Imam just before midnight local time Sunday in Misrata, on Libya’s north coast, U.S. officials said. He was taken to a U.S. Navy ship at the Misrata port for transport by military plane to Washington, where he’s expected to arrive within the next two days, one of the officials said.

Once on American soil, al-Imam will face trial in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia as the FBI continues to investigate, the Justice Department said. He faces three criminal charges that were filed in May 2015 but only recently unsealed: killing or conspiring to kill someone during an attack on a federal facility, providing support for terrorists, and using a firearm in connection with a violent crime.

Al-Imam is the second Benghazi suspect to be taken into U.S. custody. His capture comes as the attack’s suspected mastermind — Ahmed Abu Khatallah — is currently on trial in Washington, facing 18 charges related to the deadly violence that began on September 11, 2012, including the murder of an internationally protected person, providing material support to terrorists and destroying U.S. property while causing death.
Justice For The Slain
The Benghazi attacks were a major political scandal for the Obama administration and spurred multiple investigations into failures of security oversight at the highest levels of the State Department. Republican opponents accused then-President Barack Obama and then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton of failing to provide adequate security resources to the special mission compound and then misleading the American public about the nature of the attacks.

A two-year investigation by the House Benghazi committee focused on whether top State Department officials, including Clinton, ignored repeated warnings from on-the-ground personnel that the compound was vulnerable to attack. The House probe into Clinton’s role revealed that she had used a private email server for official business, which became a defining issue in the 2016 presidential campaign.

Hillary Clinton left our soldiers and ambassador to die, blamed the deaths on a YouTube video, and then famously asked: “What difference, at this point, does it make?”

The current administration has a different approach. Now, these men may finally begin to be avenged.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 51194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 72
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.6forum.info

Back to top Go down

Re: ABOUT BENGHAZI

Post  Admin on Sun 29 Oct 2017, 12:29 am

EXPLOSIVE ALLEGATIONS! CIA Operators were told to “Stand Down” during attack in Benghazi as 3 urgent requests for military back-up were denied
TREASON ANYONE?
CIA denied help during Benghazi attack
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=345o9eBm6kQ&feature=youtu.be
FOX NEWS has learned from sources who were on the ground in Benghazi that an urgent request from the CIA annex for military back-up during the attack on the U.S. consulate and subsequent attack several hours later on the annex itself was denied by the CIA chain of command -- who also told the CIA operators twice to "stand down" rather than help the ambassador's team when shots were heard at approximately 9:40 p.m. in Benghazi on Sept. 11.
Former Navy SEAL Tyrone Woods was part of a small team who was at the CIA annex about a mile from the U.S. consulate where Ambassador Chris Stevens and his team came under attack. When he and others heard the shots fired, they informed their higher-ups at the annex to tell them what they were hearing and requested permission to go to the consulate and help out. They were told to "stand down," according to sources familiar with the exchange. Soon after, they were again told to "stand down."
Woods and at least two others ignored those orders and made their way to the consulate which at that point was on fire. Shots were exchanged. The rescue team from the CIA annex evacuated those who remained at the consulate and Sean Smith, who had been killed in the initial attack. They could not find the ambassador and returned to the CIA annex at about midnight.
At that point, they called again for military support and help because they were taking fire at the CIA safe house, or annex. The request was denied. There were no communications problems at the annex, according those present at the compound. The team was in constant radio contact with their headquarters. In fact, at least one member of the team was on the roof of the annex manning a heavy machine gun when mortars were fired at the CIA compound.
The security officer had a laser on the target that was firing and repeatedly requested back-up support from a Spectre gunship, which is commonly used by U.S. Special Operations forces to provide support to Special Operations teams on the ground involved in intense firefights. The fighting at the CIA annex went on for more than four hours -- enough time for any planes based in Sigonella Air base, just 480 miles away, to arrive. Fox News has also learned that two separate Tier One Special operations forces were told to wait, among them Delta Force operators.

The Video No LONGER available. The Youtube Account closed

avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 51194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 72
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.6forum.info

Back to top Go down

Re: ABOUT BENGHAZI

Post  Admin on Tue 17 Oct 2017, 9:51 am

This came in my memories over at Facebook so copy here as a reminder.

BREAKING: Hillary Email Found Showing Instructions For Killing Ambassador Chris Stevens In Benghazi
OCT 15, 2016by JEWS NEWSin DIASPORA
Previous postNext post
http://www.jewsnews.co.il/2016/10/15/breaking-hillary-email-found-showing-instructions-for-killing-ambassador-chris-stevens-in-benghazi.html

Hillary Clinton has been destroyed with email hacks and document leaks for nearly two months now, and she will be waking up this morning to another one. In an email released Monday regarding Hillary’s Benghazi investigation, there was one specific message that detailed the exact location of Ambassador Chris Stevens. Because this email was sent through the unsecured server, it is highly probable that terrorists intercepted the message.

There were five relevant emails in the cache of Clinton emails that placed Amb. Stevens in harms way:

March 23, 2011: In this email, Clinton’s then-chief of staff Jacob Sullivan wrote to Clinton about the NATO mission in Libya. Sullivan also wrote that someone named Bill was “trying to make sure Chris Stevens gets into E. Libya.”
March 27, 2011: This is an email between two State Department officials that was then forwarded to Clinton. Regarding his location and travel plans, the email said, “The current game plan is for Mr. Stevens to move no later than Wednesday from Malta to Benghazi. He will stage off shore initially for a one day visit during which he will have meetings with TNC interlocutors and get a sense of the situation on the ground. The goal of this one day trip is for him to lay the groundwork for a stay of up to 30 days.”
April 8, 2011: An email among State Department employees that was later forwarded to Clinton said, “Security situation in Benghazi remains quiet. Chris Stevens
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 51194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 72
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.6forum.info

Back to top Go down

Re: ABOUT BENGHAZI

Post  Admin on Thu 05 Oct 2017, 10:28 am

REVEALED: Hillary’s Sick “Nickname” for Benghazi
October 3, 2017 Frank Spear
https://www.christiannewsalerts.com/hillary-benghazi/?bt_alias=eyJ1c2VySWQiOiAiMjA0NzVlMjEtYmFkYy00ZGM0LTkxMDYtOTUwZDNlN2Q5MjRlIn0%3D&utm_campaign=CNA_20170715&utm_source=boomtrain&utm_medium=automated
The release of Hillary Clinton’s new book What Happened, is stirring up a new batch of questions and heartache for the families who lost their loved ones during the 2012 terrorist attack in Benghazi. Specifically, Pat Smith, mother of US Foreign Service Officer Sean Smith, who was killed in the attack, is coming forward and expressing her outrage.

It is no secret that former President Barack Obama and then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton were responsible for not stopping the attack when they had the chance. According to Fox News, during an interview on the topic of her new book, Clinton mentioned the section about Benghazi and said: “But boy, it was turned into a political football. And it was aimed at undermining my credibility, my record, my accomplishments.”

She may as well have said, “Poor, poor me. Look what they did to poor me when Benghazi happened.”

Instead of showing an ounce of remorse for the families that will never see their children, husbands, fathers, brothers, or friends again, she is upset that her credibility took a smudge for something she knowingly did.

Smith spoke out with regard to Clinton’s actions after the death of her son. “I don’t see how it was political in any way—it was Hillary’s baby from day one. She ordered all that stuff, and then she went to bed when [the attack] was going on,” Smith stated to Fox News.

Terrorists attacked Benghazi, and as a result, four Americans were killed. Besides Sean Smith, there were the deaths of Ambassador Christopher Stevens, and Navy SEALs Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods.

The State Department — which was led by Clinton at that time — ignored the security concerns that led up to the attack, despite the concerns brought to their attention several times. Ambassador Stevens specifically asked for more troops because of the fear of an incoming attack from jihadis.

Instead of acknowledging what he was saying and sending help to ensure that everyone made it out alive, Clinton went to sleep without doing anything when the attacks started. Now, the United States has four fewer heroes in it, and Clinton is upset over the damage to her reputation.

After the attacks played out, the Accountability Review Board concluded, beyond any reasonable doubt, that there were problems in the State Department that made its leadership culpable. The Board said there were “Systematic failures and leadership and management deficiencies at senior levels” at the State Department.

To Hillary, Benghazi was a political football, aimed at undermining her credibility, record, and accomplishments. Was that all it was?

Was Benghazi merely a political football for Hillary?

Yes
No
Next
This already tragic story gets worse. Smith wanted more information about what exactly happened to her son. The State Department — again, led by Clinton — ignored the request and went on as if nothing happened.

Smith concluded by saying, “I am his mother. He was 34 years old, but he was still my baby.” She continued, “I know what the government thinks of me, and I think just that much of the government – it stinks. This is how you get treated by the government, or, at least the way you used to.”

The tremendous loss of the Benghazi families is incomprehensible for those who have lost loved ones in the service of our country, and even then it is compounded by the jaded heart of a political opportunist. Sean Smith’s uncle, Michael Ingmire summarized the situation well, “She was standing, basically before the coffins of Americans, blaming a horrible anti-Islamic video, but she’s just being consistent with her psychosis. The liar, the criminal, the crooked politician—those are the three faces of Hillary.”
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 51194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 72
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.6forum.info

Back to top Go down

ALERT: Benghazi Families Issue Brutal Hillary Demand

Post  Admin on Fri 29 Sep 2017, 9:14 pm

ALERT: Benghazi Families Issue Brutal Hillary Demand
September 28, 2017 Frank Spear
https://www.christiannewsalerts.com/benghazi-fam-issue-hillary-demand/?utm_campaign=CNA_20170715&utm_medium=automated&bt_alias=eyJ1c2VySWQiOiAiMjA0NzVlMjEtYmFkYy00ZGM0LTkxMDYtOTUwZDNlN2Q5MjRlIn0%3D&utm_source=boomtrain
The Benghazi terrorist attack that resulted in the deaths of Ambassador Christopher Stevens, Tyrone Woods and Sean Smith was the result of negligence. As details of this story from 2012 continue to emerge, the parents of Woods and Smith have a request.

These parents want to see Hillary Clinton brought to justice over the deaths of their sons, insisting that she should stand trial, according to World Net Daily.

The attack was carried out by a group of Muslim terrorists. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama seemingly knew that the attack was coming, but did nothing to stop it. In fact, they went on to tell the parents that the death of their children was due to an obscure YouTube video, not negligence.

A case was brought on by Larry Klayman from Freedom Watch on behalf of the parents, Patricia Smith and Charles Woods. The basis of the case was that Clinton not only lied about the attack but went on to defame the families of the victims by accusing them of lying.

The charges included “defamation, false light, and intentional infliction of emotional distress.” Shockingly, the case was dismissed at a lower level, citing the behavior as part of Clinton’s scope of employment, which happened to be secretary of state.

Even with the likely fact that Clinton used her private, unsecured email service to transmit information that eventually led to the deaths of the Americans in Benghazi, Klayman is having to fight for the overturn of the dismissal.

Clinton was previously dismissed on a default judgment by an Obama-appointed judge. The basis for that dismissal was that Clinton was not properly served and therefore could not be brought to court.

Klayman went to Washington in order to fight for Smith and Woods. The parents of the two brave Americans said that the FBI determined that Clinton’s use of the email server was “extremely careless.”

The lawsuit claims that as a result of the carelessness, their children are no longer on this earth. That, if anything, should at least make Clinton want to show remorse for her behavior. Instead, she accused the parents of lying and neglected all responsibility.

The parents also used the grounds that Clinton lied about the cause of the attack. She initially said that a YouTube video showing the Islamic prophet Mohammed getting mocked was what caused the attack. It was later found that this was not the case.

Benghazi parents want to see Hillary Clinton brought to justice over the deaths of their sons. Will they ever see justice?

Will Hillary ever be held accountable for Benghazi deaths?

Yes
No
Next
Klayman laid the groundwork for his argument: “Having used a secret private email server that we now know was used to communicate with Ambassador Christopher Stevens with confidential and classified government information, and which we also now know was likely hacked by hostile adversaries such as Iran, Russia, China and North Korea aligning with terrorist groups, it is clear that Hillary Clinton allegedly negligently and recklessly gave up the classified location of the plaintiffs’ sons…”

One can hope that this is not going to end here. The hunt for the whole truth and eventual conviction of Clinton is, in the eyes of many Americans who see this crime for what it is, a crucial undertaking.

Klayman and many like him are going to continue the fight to get to the bottom of what really happened in Benghazi. At the very least, the parents deserve to hear the truth with their own ears.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 51194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 72
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.6forum.info

Back to top Go down

Re: ABOUT BENGHAZI

Post  Admin on Mon 18 Sep 2017, 8:27 pm

WATCH: Hillary is Furious After Someone Says 1 Word to Her Face
September 15, 2017
WATCH: Hillary is Furious After Someone Says 1 Word to Her Face
https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/political-corruption/hillary-furious-1-word.htm?utm_medium=automated&utm_source=Boomtrain&bt_alias=eyJ1c2VySWQiOiAiZWY0MGMwZDctYmU0Ni00YjlhLThhNGUtZWNlOTA1ODUyOTJjIn0%3D&utm_campaign=dynamic_campaign
U.S. Embassy London / CCL
Hillary Clinton’s been out promoting her new memoir, “What Happened?,” but she’s still not telling what “really” happened. At a recent book signing at the Union Square Barnes & Noble, Hillary Clinton was asked some rather pressing questions by Laura Loomer, a former reporter with The Rebel Media.

Loomer asked Clinton, “So the American people would like to know, what happened to your 33,000 emails?” Following a trademark Clinton cackle, Loomer asked another one: “What happened in Benghazi?”

At the mention of Benghazi, Clinton averted her eyes and told Loomer to “read the book.”

Add your email address below to receive quality, honest conservative news and analysis every day:

Loomer then asked, “What happened in Haiti?” To this, Hillary said, “I’m so sorry you believe things that are untrue.”

Loomer is best known for being one of the activists who rushed the stage during the performance of Julius Caesar in New York’s Central Park.

Watch below as Loomer asks Hillary the tough questions to her face:

What Happened to Those 33,000 Emails?
While Mrs. Clinton may hope that her private email server will be forgotten, it remains an issue. White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders told the White House press corps that the Justice Department should consider prosecuting former FBI Director James Comey.

Besides leaking classified memos to the press, Sanders also accused Comey of intentionally subverting the FBI’s criminal investigation of Clinton for political reasons, saying:

Anybody that breaks the law, whatever that process is that needs to be followed, should certainly be looked at…If they determine that that’s the course of action to take, then they should certainly do that, but I’m not here to ever direct DOJ in — in the actions that they should take.
For her own part, Clinton places much of the blame for her 2016 loss on Comey and his decision to announce the FBI’s investigation into her private email server.

What Happened in Benghazi?
Ever since a CIA annex in Benghazi, Libya, was attacked on Sept. 11, 2012, conservatives and Republicans have accused the Obama administration of intentionally subverting the official investigation.

Sharyl Attkisson, a former investigative reporter for CBS, accused then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton of knowingly lying to the American people and the families of those killed in the terrorist attack in her book “The Smear.” The Obama administration wanted everyone to think that an obscure YouTube video set off the violence, when in fact on-the-ground reports had been warning about the possibility of a terrorist attack for months.

Recently, security contractors who were involved in securing the Benghazi compound came forward with more evidence of negligence and the resulting coverup.

The Obama White House and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton effectively covered their tracks so as to hide their negligence — they have no intention of ever telling the full story. And the last thing Hillary Clinton wants to hear is “What happened in Benghazi?”


BREAKING: Benghazi Bombshell Dropped, Confirming the Truth
September 14, 2017
BREAKING: Benghazi Bombshell Dropped, Confirming the Truth
https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/crime-criminal-justice/crime-stories/benghazi-bombshell-dropped-truth.htm?utm_medium=automated&utm_source=Boomtrain&bt_alias=eyJ1c2VySWQiOiAiZWY0MGMwZDctYmU0Ni00YjlhLThhNGUtZWNlOTA1ODUyOTJjIn0%3D&utm_campaign=dynamic_campaign
Left - brwn_yd_grl / CCL Right - YouTube
As Hillary Clinton promotes the release of her ironically titled book, “What Happened,” Americans are left wondering what happened with the thousands of missing emails that Clinton’s lawyers systematically deleted before investigators could review them. Likewise, Americans may never know what happened when former President Bill Clinton met privately with Attorney General Loretta Lynch just days before the investigation against his wife was suspended.

Most importantly, though, Americans are wondering what happened at Benghazi when four American public servants were left to fight for their lives under the negligent leadership of then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. However, the extent of the State Department’s failure is coming into focus. Two security contractors have come forward to detail the security lapses at the Benghazi diplomatic compound, as well as the government’s efforts to keep them silent.

Wholesale Incompetence
Brad Owens and Jerry Torres of Torres Advanced Enterprise Solutions appeared on Fox’s “Tucker Carlson Tonight” and gave a remarkably different account of the Sept. 11, 2012, events than the explanation previously offered by the Barack Obama administration.

On that day, militant Islamists stormed the Benghazi compound and killed U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens, foreign service officer Sean Smith and Navy SEALs Ty Woods and Glenn Doherty.

The men of Torres Advanced Enterprise Solutions said the company was denied a bid to provide security at the compound in the spring of 2012. Instead, the mission went to an obscure and untested U.K.-based company called The Blue Mountain Group.

Owens, a former Army intelligence officer who had personally conducted reconnaissance of the Benghazi facility prior to his company’s bid, told Carlson that he was shocked at the State Department’s decision:

Blue Mountain U.K. is a teeny, tiny, little security company registered in Wales that had never had a diplomatic security contract, had never done any high threat contracts anywhere else in the world that we’ve been able to find, much less in high threat areas for the U.S. government. They had a few guys on the ground.
Despite Torres and Owens operating an American company, they were undercut in their bid for the assignment by four percent and lost out to the British competitor.

Owens explained the decision:

In 1990, Congress passed a law that required contracts of this nature to go to the lowest bidder that’s technically acceptable. Now, what that has created is a race to the bottom, is what we call it. So basically, every company tries to cut every corner they can for these contracts.
It was not long before the State Department’s decision came back to haunt them. Blue Mountain ended up outsourcing their security personnel, bringing in unarmed and inexperienced guards to contend with an increasingly hostile environment.

As it became clear that Islamic militants were saturating the Libyan city, Ambassador Stevens sent a diplomatic cable to Washington explaining that the compound was at risk from a “coordinated attack.”

Too little, too late
In what Owens calls an “admission of the mistake of choosing the wrong company,” the State Department asked his company to intervene just days before the impending attack. However, lacking adequate time to set up defenses at Benghazi, the compound was unable to sustain the coordinated assault that came on Sept. 11 and took the lives of four Americans.

Torres, the company CEO and a former Green Beret, called the tragedy “bad decision-making from top to bottom.” He learned of the attack on the compound in the same way as other Americans, by watching the events unfold on television.

Torres was suspicious of the White House claim that the siege began in response to an anti-Islam video:

Coming from a military background, I would expect the administration to tell the truth. So I bought into it for a minute. But I didn’t believe it in the back of my mind.
The cover up
Before long, State Department contracting officer Jan Visintainer summoned Torres to Rosslyn, Virginia, for a debriefing. Torres described the encounter as a gag order:

[Visintainer] said that I and people from Torres should not speak to the media, should not speak to any officials with respect to the Benghazi program.
Visintainer even pressed Torres to tell the media that guards should not be armed at U.S. embassies. The former special forces operator described the exchange, admitting that Visintainer told him:

In her opinion, that guards should not be armed at U.S. embassies. She just made that blanket statement. … And she said that they weren’t required in Benghazi. So I was kind of confused about that. And she said that she would like my support in saying that if that came up. And I looked at her. I just didn’t respond.
Torres and Owens were both conflicted about coming forward with their story since they did not want to endanger the prosperity of some 8,000 employees that depend on the company’s survival.

Unfortunately, the pair believes that they are facing repercussions for their reluctance to echo the State Department position. The security firm has since lost out on 18 of their last 20 bids for security force contracts.

Who’s really at fault?
Meanwhile, those government employees who made the truly costly and negligent mistakes have gone unpunished. Owens says that those “who made the poor choices that actually, I would say, were more responsible for the Benghazi attacks than anyone else, they’re still in the same positions, making security choices for our embassies overseas now.”

Owens says that a “change in management” at the State Department has allowed him and his partner to finally come forward. Torres regrets “not bringing this up earlier,” though the pair is hopeful that their testimonies can fix a broken system.

Torres puts the high cost of incompetence from the Clinton State Department in perspective: “A U.S. ambassador is dead and nobody is held accountable for it. And three guys … all died trying to defend him.”
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 51194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 72
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.6forum.info

Back to top Go down

Re: ABOUT BENGHAZI

Post  Admin on Mon 18 Sep 2017, 1:41 pm

BREAKING: Benghazi Bombshell Dropped, Confirming the Truth
September 14, 2017
BREAKING: Benghazi Bombshell Dropped, Confirming the Truth
Left - brwn_yd_grl / CCL Right - YouTube
https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/crime-criminal-justice/crime-stories/benghazi-bombshell-dropped-truth.htm?utm_medium=automated&utm_source=Boomtrain&bt_alias=eyJ1c2VySWQiOiAiZWY0MGMwZDctYmU0Ni00YjlhLThhNGUtZWNlOTA1ODUyOTJjIn0%3D&utm_campaign=dynamic_campaign
As Hillary Clinton promotes the release of her ironically titled book, “What Happened,” Americans are left wondering what happened with the thousands of missing emails that Clinton’s lawyers systematically deleted before investigators could review them. Likewise, Americans may never know what happened when former President Bill Clinton met privately with Attorney General Loretta Lynch just days before the investigation against his wife was suspended.

Most importantly, though, Americans are wondering what happened at Benghazi when four American public servants were left to fight for their lives under the negligent leadership of then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. However, the extent of the State Department’s failure is coming into focus. Two security contractors have come forward to detail the security lapses at the Benghazi diplomatic compound, as well as the government’s efforts to keep them silent.

Wholesale Incompetence
Brad Owens and Jerry Torres of Torres Advanced Enterprise Solutions appeared on Fox’s “Tucker Carlson Tonight” and gave a remarkably different account of the Sept. 11, 2012, events than the explanation previously offered by the Barack Obama administration.

On that day, militant Islamists stormed the Benghazi compound and killed U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens, foreign service officer Sean Smith and Navy SEALs Ty Woods and Glenn Doherty.

The men of Torres Advanced Enterprise Solutions said the company was denied a bid to provide security at the compound in the spring of 2012. Instead, the mission went to an obscure and untested U.K.-based company called The Blue Mountain Group.

Owens, a former Army intelligence officer who had personally conducted reconnaissance of the Benghazi facility prior to his company’s bid, told Carlson that he was shocked at the State Department’s decision:

Blue Mountain U.K. is a teeny, tiny, little security company registered in Wales that had never had a diplomatic security contract, had never done any high threat contracts anywhere else in the world that we’ve been able to find, much less in high threat areas for the U.S. government. They had a few guys on the ground.
Despite Torres and Owens operating an American company, they were undercut in their bid for the assignment by four percent and lost out to the British competitor.

Owens explained the decision:

In 1990, Congress passed a law that required contracts of this nature to go to the lowest bidder that’s technically acceptable. Now, what that has created is a race to the bottom, is what we call it. So basically, every company tries to cut every corner they can for these contracts.
It was not long before the State Department’s decision came back to haunt them. Blue Mountain ended up outsourcing their security personnel, bringing in unarmed and inexperienced guards to contend with an increasingly hostile environment.

As it became clear that Islamic militants were saturating the Libyan city, Ambassador Stevens sent a diplomatic cable to Washington explaining that the compound was at risk from a “coordinated attack.”

Too little, too late
In what Owens calls an “admission of the mistake of choosing the wrong company,” the State Department asked his company to intervene just days before the impending attack. However, lacking adequate time to set up defenses at Benghazi, the compound was unable to sustain the coordinated assault that came on Sept. 11 and took the lives of four Americans.

Torres, the company CEO and a former Green Beret, called the tragedy “bad decision-making from top to bottom.” He learned of the attack on the compound in the same way as other Americans, by watching the events unfold on television.

Torres was suspicious of the White House claim that the siege began in response to an anti-Islam video:

Coming from a military background, I would expect the administration to tell the truth. So I bought into it for a minute. But I didn’t believe it in the back of my mind.
The cover up
Before long, State Department contracting officer Jan Visintainer summoned Torres to Rosslyn, Virginia, for a debriefing. Torres described the encounter as a gag order:

[Visintainer] said that I and people from Torres should not speak to the media, should not speak to any officials with respect to the Benghazi program.
Visintainer even pressed Torres to tell the media that guards should not be armed at U.S. embassies. The former special forces operator described the exchange, admitting that Visintainer told him:

In her opinion, that guards should not be armed at U.S. embassies. She just made that blanket statement. … And she said that they weren’t required in Benghazi. So I was kind of confused about that. And she said that she would like my support in saying that if that came up. And I looked at her. I just didn’t respond.
Torres and Owens were both conflicted about coming forward with their story since they did not want to endanger the prosperity of some 8,000 employees that depend on the company’s survival.

Unfortunately, the pair believes that they are facing repercussions for their reluctance to echo the State Department position. The security firm has since lost out on 18 of their last 20 bids for security force contracts.

Who’s really at fault?
Meanwhile, those government employees who made the truly costly and negligent mistakes have gone unpunished. Owens says that those “who made the poor choices that actually, I would say, were more responsible for the Benghazi attacks than anyone else, they’re still in the same positions, making security choices for our embassies overseas now.”

Owens says that a “change in management” at the State Department has allowed him and his partner to finally come forward. Torres regrets “not bringing this up earlier,” though the pair is hopeful that their testimonies can fix a broken system.

Torres puts the high cost of incompetence from the Clinton State Department in perspective: “A U.S. ambassador is dead and nobody is held accountable for it. And three guys … all died trying to defend him.”

avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 51194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 72
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.6forum.info

Back to top Go down

Re: ABOUT BENGHAZI

Post  Admin on Fri 15 Sep 2017, 1:42 am

BREAKING: Trump Receives Urgent Terror Warning
September 13, 2017 Ben Baker
https://www.christiannewsalerts.com/trump-receives-urgent-terror-warning/?utm_source=Boomtrain&utm_medium=afternoon&utm_campaign=20170914-2
It’s been five years since the terrible Benghazi terrorist attack that left four Americans dead. What’s upsetting is that not only could it have been prevented, but it may happen again.

According to Fox News, two security men from an American security company who tried to assist in preventing the original attack said another Benghazi attack could happen because the same officials who botched the security are still in office. They also said existing contract rules motivate security companies to cut corners.

The two men, Brad Owens and Jerry Torres, work for Torres Advanced Enterprise Solutions, a private security contractor based out of the US. They insist that their company was pressured to keep quiet about the failed security in Benghazi.

The company has a long history of providing security for US embassies around the world. Working in highly dangerous locales like Africa, the Middle East, and South America. This company knows what it takes to provide accurate and well-executed security measures to keep American diplomats safe and protect lives.

Owens is a former Army Intelligence Officer and has experience in Libya from his work for the company in 2012 as point man. He said the attack on Benghazi was a result of the death of Muammar Qaddafi, the Libyan dictator who was overthrown and murdered in the streets in 2011. The death led to destabilization in the area where terrorist organizations like al Queda began to thrive and obtain power.

His company applied to provide security for the embassy but were beat out by a smaller less experienced company, The Blue Mountain Group, based out of the UK, because they were cheaper.

When the attack occurred, the hired security company proved incapable of doing their job in the face of a “coordinated attack” and the Torres Advanced Enterprise Solutions company was contacted for assistance.

Owens says their company lacked the necessary time to mount a proper defense to prevent the horrendous attack. “There was nothing we could’ve done about it,” Owens said. “If we’d had a one-month warning… who knows what might’ve happened.”

To their surprise, the Obama administration and Hillary Clinton, who was Secretary of State at the time, blamed the attack on an anti-Islam video and subsequent protest, claiming they didn’t have the warnings or the time to properly secure the embassy.

Even worse, Torres claims he was called in by the State Department contracting officer, Jan Visintainer, and told to keep quiet about it. “[Visintainer] said that I and people from Torres should not speak to the media, should not speak to any officials with respect to the Benghazi program,” Torres said.

Some of the same Benghazi security officials are still serving. Does this make you fear for Trump’s safety?

Do you fear for President Trump's safety?

Yes
No
Next
The two men couldn’t keep quiet any longer as those individuals responsible for the improper security are still in office. Owens says those responsible for the lack of security at Benghazi, “who made the poor choices that actually, I would say, were more responsible for the Benghazi attacks than anyone else, they’re still in the same positions, making security choices for our embassies overseas now.”

He also blamed the lack of security on a law meant to cut costs by accepting the lowest bidder on contracts. “In 1990, Congress passed a law that required contracts of this nature to go to the lowest bidder that’s technically acceptable. Now, what that has created is a race to the bottom, is what we call it. So basically, every company tries to cut every corner they can for these contracts.”

Both men are hopeful that with their insider information on what really happened, and with Trump as president, justice can be done for the families of the four lost and the bureaucrats responsible for the Benghazi tragedy will finally be replaced, so US embassies can be better protected from future attacks.



avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 51194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 72
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.6forum.info

Back to top Go down

Re: ABOUT BENGHAZI

Post  Admin on Wed 13 Sep 2017, 11:22 pm

Two Security Experts Tell The Truth About What Happened In Benghazi Five Years Ago
http://conservativefighters.com/news/two-security-experts-tell-truth-happened-benghazi-five-years-ago/
Five years have passed since the terrorist attack on the State Department annex in Benghazi, Libya, which left four Americans servicemen dead. While Hillary Clinton starts to promote her new book “What Happened,” many Americans wonder what happened.

Now, security employees of the firm hired to protect the diplomatic compound came forward with what happened, claiming they were “silenced” about security gaps.

Jerry Torres and Brad Owens in an interview with Tucker Carlson said that Torres Advanced Enterprise Solutions (TAES) was forced to stay silent about the security issues that resulted in the deaths of the four Americans.

“A U.S. ambassador is dead and nobody is held accountable for it. And three guys … all died trying to defend him,” Green Beret veteran and the firm’s CEO Torres told Carlson.
Brad Owens, a former Army intelligence officer, continued, “Those who made the poor choices that actually, I would say, were more responsible for the Benghazi attacks than anyone else, they’re still in the same positions, making security choices for our embassies overseas now.”

Fox News confirmed that the firm bid on the security contract for the Benghazi diplomatic annex, but it was given to The Blue Mountain Group.

Owens spoke about The Blue Mountain Group’s security resources.

“Blue Mountain U.K. is a teeny, tiny, little security company registered in Wales that had never had a diplomatic security contract, had never done any high threat contracts anywhere else in the world that we’ve been able to find, much less in high threat areas for the U.S. government. They had a few guys on the ground,” he said.

Fox News’s Catherine Herridge cited the problems that led to security failure in her report:

“The Blue Mountain Group hired guards through another company who were not armed.”
Owens said that it was well-known after fall of dictator Moammar Gaddafi the security situation was “deteriorating” and terror groups were flooding Libya.
Yet, the late Ambassador Christopher Stevens’ requests for security enhancements went unheeded.
By Aug. 31, 2012, the State Dept. reportedly asked TAES to intervene. Owens says this is an “admission of the mistake of choosing the wrong company. “absolutely” silenced their testimony about the security failure.
“Visintainer said that I and people from Torres should not speak to the media, should not speak to any officials with respect to the Benghazi program,” Torres stated.

“In 1990, Congress passed a law that required contracts of this nature to go to the lowest bidder that’s technically acceptable,” Owens stated. “Now, what that has created is a race to the bottom, is what we call it. So basically, every company tries to cut every corner they can for these contracts.”

“Let’s just say there’s been a change at management at Department of State,” Owens continued. “I feel now that, given that the politics have been taken out of the Benghazi situation, now that there’s no longer a candidate or anything related to it, a change of administrations, that actually, we have an opportunity here to fix the problems that made it happen.”

9-12-17 Benghazi: 5 Years Later - New information
Sandy Frazier
Published on 12 Sep 2017
Benghazi: Five Years Later - Contractors silenced - Jerry Torres, CEO of security firm for U.S. embassies and consulates around the world... and Brad Owens, former army intelligence officer.  They have firsthand knowledge of 2012 terrorist attack on Benghazi. Report by Catherine Herridge airing on FNC's Tucker Carlson.
Category
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R68pRl6CLtk

Please share this post on Facebook with your thoughts.
What is your opinion on this? Scroll down to comment below!


Laura Loomer Confronts Hillary Clinton at Book Signing
http://thepoliticalinsider.com/hillary-laura-loomer-book-signing/?utm_medium=web-push&utm_source=os-dashboard-send
News Commentary
By Matt | Contributor | September 13, 2017 4:10PM
Hillary Clinton is back on the road for her book tour, and for the price of $2,000 you can get your hands on a VIP ticket to meet the woman who lost the presidency to Donald Trump.

The “platinum VIP ticket” to Clinton’s talks in Toronto, Vancouver, and Montreal costs a hefty $2,375.95, according to Fox News. And for that money, you get two front-row seats, a photo with Hillary, and a signed book. A $30 value, yours for only $2,375!

Not everyone has to pay money to meet Hillary and get a signed copy of her latest snooze tract, however. A handful of Hillary super fans waited outside the Manhattan Barnes and Noble Tuesday night to meet Hillary and get their books signed. They began lining up at 11 PM last night for a signing that was scheduled at 11 AM today. Oh, and Hillary showed up an hour late, so folks had to wait a total of thirteen hours just to have 10 seconds with the failed presidential candidate.


Among those waiting in line to meet Hillary was Laura Loomer, a conservative journalist who works for The Rebel. She came with a copy of Clinton’s book to get signed – and a line of uncomfortable questions the former First Lady wasn’t expecting.

Below is the transcript of what went down. Get ready, it’s super entertaining:

LAURA LOOMER: Hi, it’s so great to see you.
HILLARY CLINTON: Well it’s great for you to be here.
LOOMER: Thanks for having me.
[Clinton raises head]
CLINTON: Thank you for coming.
LOOMER: Thanks for having me.
[Handshake]
LOOMER: So the American people would really like to know what happened to your 33,000 emails?
[Clinton laughs]
LOOMER: What happened in Benghazi?
CLINTON: Go read the book.
LOOMER: What happened to the millions of dollars that was supposed to go to the people in Haiti?
CLINTON: You know what I’m so sorry you believe things that are untrue.
LOOMER: What happened to Seth Rich?
What happened to your health, Hillary?
[Loomer pushed out of the way]

[Loomer runs into Huma Abedin]
LOOMER TO ABEDIN: Huma! It’s so great to see you. I have a question for you. When are you going to divorce your husband (Anthony Weiner) for texting underage girls?
MAN: We’re going to need for you to step out of here.
LOOMER: I need my book. I paid for my book.
MAN: Step out of here. Thank you, ma’am.
LOOMER: Okay.

Watch below:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=elthI4UtEUg
Hillary Clinton Confronted at 2017 Book Signing! Deleted Emails? Benghazi? Seth Rich? [mirrored]
Mirrored copy (excerpt from 7:13 to end) of video entitled "Laura Loomer sneaks into Hillary book signing, asks her about emails, Haiti money and Seth Rich!" posted on the McSimonus channel on YouTube.
Hillary may have told Loomer to “read the book” when questioned about Benghazi, but all you’ll find in actually reading the book is how upset she was that people were using that screw-up to criticize her.


Clearly there’s some bad blood – as one of the survivors of the Benghazi attacks, Kris Paronto, blasted her on the 5th anniversary of the attack.
Interestingly enough, Hillary doesn’t blame the Benghazi attack on a fake YouTube video once in the book. I guess that’s progress, kind of.
Share this story if you love watching Hillary get humiliated!




ALERT: Judge Gives Hillary Horrible News
September 12, 2017 Adam Selene
https://www.christiannewsalerts.com/judge-gives-hillary-horrible-news/?utm_medium=push&utm_source=AP&utm_campaign=onesignal
Legal difficulties appear to follow Hillary Clinton wherever she goes.

A Maryland judge has ordered the state bar to launch a new investigation into the three lawyers that helped former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton delete emails before the investigation into her private email server, according to The Washington Times.

Cheryl Mills, David E. Kendall, and Heather Samuelson will all be investigated for destroying evidence related to an FBI investigation. Judge Paul F. Harris Jr. says that accusations leveled against the three lawyers were too egregious to dismiss, and must be investigated further. According to the judge, it is the state bar’s obligation to handle investigations — regardless of who lodged the complaint.

Hillary Clinton was accused of violating State Department protocol and mishandling classified information for maintaining a private server in her New York home. She used the private server to conduct official State Department business. Many of Clinton’s aides also used email addresses associated with the private server.

The private server was discovered during the course of a congressional investigation into the Clinton State Department’s handling of the Benghazi Embassy attack in 2012. Clinton was ordered to turn over all work-related emails. She was permitted to delete any private communications.

However, according to a complaint, Hillary Clinton’s legal team was overzealous, and deleted work-related emails in addition to private emails. Tom Fitton, president of the government watchdog Judicial Watch, claims that Hillary Clinton failed to turn over at least 432 work-related emails to the proper authorities. Now, Clinton’s legal team is being accused of destroying evidence.

Judge Harris Jr. announced his decision on Sunday. The following day, Hillary Clinton announced the release of her new book, What Happened, along with a month-long book tour to promote the memoir.

Lawyer Ty Clevenger, who has been pursuing sanctions against Hillary Clinton’s legal teams, is calling for her attorneys to be suspended or disbarred. Judges in Arkansas and The District of Columbia have dismissed earlier attempts by Clevenger to investigate the lawyers who deleted emails on Clinton’s behalf.

Clevenger recently attracted headlines after appearing on Fox News’ Tucker Carlson Tonight. While appearing on the nightly news show, he accused the FBI of denying his recent Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests for political reasons.

Clevenger, who is researching a book on Judicial corruption, was hoping to use the Clinton email investigation as a case study.

According to Clevenger, the FBI denied his request for information relating to the Hillary Clinton email investigation because the “public doesn’t care,” The Daily Caller reports.

The lawyer believes that the FBI denied his request in an attempt to cover their tracks. “Former FBI director James Comey had already decided to exonerate Mrs. Clinton,” Clevenger explained. “The FBI is trying to cover its own rear end. I think they know this thing is going to look terrible for them. They deep-sixed this, they white-washed it and they don’t want the documents coming out just showing how badly they covered it up.”

The Maryland Attorney Grievance Commission originally decided to block Clevenger’s request, claiming an investigation was “frivolous.” However, Judge Harris rejected the commission’s decision, claiming that the term “frivolous” has never been used to justify a decision. “I just think this is a rather easy decision at this point,” Judge Harris said. “The court is ordering bar counsel to investigate.”


Hillary Clinton's Illness Revealed
VIDEO 1635 mins
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=338&v=Zr1IDQ2V1eM

Ted Noel
Published on 29 Aug 2016
Videos constructed from public sources that show the true Hillary Clinton. All video used under the doctrine of FAIR USE.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 51194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 72
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.6forum.info

Back to top Go down

Re: ABOUT BENGHAZI

Post  Admin on Fri 11 Aug 2017, 12:49 pm

Huma Abedin Is In BIG Trouble After Judge Uncovers What She Covered From Americans About Benghazi
http://conservativefighters.com/news/huma-abedin-big-trouble-judge-uncovers-covered-americans-benghazi/
A federal judge ordered the State Department on Tuesday to resume its search for emails and other records related to the 2012 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi in which four Americans died.

D.C. District Court Judge Amit Mehta ruled that the agency has not fulfilled its duty in properly searching for all relevant documents related to the attack in which U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans lost their lives.

Documents may include additional communication between Hillary Clinton, who was secretary of state at the time, and her staff.

“The court finds that State’s search was inadequate insofar as it did not search the official state.gov e-mail accounts of Secretary Clinton’s three aides, and orders State to conduct a supplemental search of those accounts,” according to the ruling.

The aides include Huma Abedin, former deputy chief of staff; Cheryl Mills, former chief of staff; and Jacob Sullivan, former director of policy planning.

The judge said while the State Department likely won’t be able to “adequately” produce emails sent from Clinton’s private email server while she served at the time as secretary of state, the agency “has an obligation to search its own server for responsive records.”
Mehta also expressed doubt that a more thorough search of Clinton’s and top aides’ official State Department emails on the attack would “produce any marginal return” but required it regardless.

Judicial Watch, a conservative watchdog group, said the ruling is another victory in its efforts to obtain access to thousands of records related to the incident through a Freedom of Information Act request.

Hillary’s top aid’s emails were never searched in regards to Benghazi, which means Abedin lied in 2015 when she testified behind closed doors in the Benghazi hearings.

“This major court ruling may finally result in more answers about the Benghazi scandal – and Hillary Clinton’s involvement in it – as we approach the attack’s fifth anniversary,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “It is remarkable that we had to battle both the Obama and Trump administrations to break through the State Department’s Benghazi stonewall. Why are Secretary Tillerson and Attorney General Sessions wasting taxpayer dollars protecting Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration?”

Judicial Watch asked a federal court to compel the Trump State Department to undertake a thorough search of all emails of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton regarding the terrorist attack on Benghazi, including those of Clinton’s closest advisors. Judicial Watch also specifically asked the court to compel the agency to produce all records of communications between Clinton and top aide Jake Sullivan relating to Ambassador Susan Rice’s appearance on NBC’s “Meet the Press” the Sunday following the 2012 Benghazi massacre.

Judicial Watch first submitted a FOIA request shortly after news broke that Clinton had used an unofficial email server while serving as the head of the State Department in March 2015.

The group then filed suit against the agency two months later, after the State Department failed to respond to its request.
The State Department has until Sept. 22 to update the court on its additional search.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 51194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 72
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.6forum.info

Back to top Go down

Re: ABOUT BENGHAZI

Post  Admin on Thu 10 Aug 2017, 6:56 pm

Federal Judge Amit Mehta Orders New Search For Clinton Benghazi Emails
http://thepoliticalinsider.com/hillary-clinton-benghazi-emails/?utm_medium=web-push&utm_source=os-dashboard-send
By Rusty | Featured Contributor | August 10, 2017 1:09PM
A federal judge has ordered a search of the accounts of several Hillary Clinton aides, saying the State Department hadn’t done enough to try and track down emails sent pertaining to the Benghazi terrorist attack in 2012.

US District Court Judge Amit Mehta ordered the department to conduct a search of the accounts for three top aides, Huma Abedin, Cheryl Mills and Jake Sullivan.

The State Department never “searched the one records system over which it has always had control and that is almost certain to contain some responsive records,” Mehta wrote in the opinion.

He is referring to in-house emails sent and received via Hillary and her aides’ state.gov accounts.

Via Politico:

Nine months after the presidential election was decided, a federal judge is ordering the State Department to try again to find emails Hillary Clinton wrote about the Benghazi attack.
U.S. District Court Judge Amit Mehta ruled that the State Department had not done enough to try to track down messages Clinton may have sent about the assault on the U.S. diplomatic compound on Sept. 11, 2012 — an attack that killed four Americans, including the U.S. ambassador to Libya.



In all, State found 348 Benghazi-related messages or documents that were sent to or from Clinton in a period of nearly five months after the attack.

However, the conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch argued that the search wasn’t good enough because State never tried to search its own systems for relevant messages in the official email accounts of Clinton’s top aides.
The judge agreed, saying the State Department has “an obligation to search its own server for responsive records,” he wrote.


Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton issued a statement indicating he was pleased with the ruling.


“This major court ruling may finally result in more answers about the Benghazi scandal — and Hillary Clinton’s involvement in it — as we approach the attack’s fifth anniversary,” Fitton said.

Mehta was appointed to his seat by President Barack Obama in 2014.

Should Hillary Clinton Still Be Locked Up?

Yes!

No.
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 51194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 72
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.6forum.info

Back to top Go down

Re: ABOUT BENGHAZI

Post  Admin on Sat 05 Aug 2017, 7:08 pm

http://www.jewsnews.co.il/2016/08/03/bombshell-wikileaks-claim-clinton-emails-show-she-knowingly-armed-isis.html
BOMBSHELL : Wikileaks Claim – Clinton Emails Show She Knowingly Armed ISIS
AUG 03, 2016by JEWS NEWSin DIASPORA

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was well aware that the U.S. was sending arms from Libya to Syria in 2011, just a year before the Benghazi consulate attack.

Hillary Clinton denied knowing about the weapons shipments when she testified under oath in early 2013.

That testimony is below:
Rand Paul Destroys Hillary Clinton Over Benghazi-Gate During Capitol Hill Press Conference
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jriU_cPU9Vk
Julian Assange, Wikileaks founder, and editor in chief stated that he has Hillary Clinton emails in his possession that prove otherwise.
Well, WikiLeaks has become the rebel library of Alexandria. It is the single most significant collection of information that doesn’t exist elsewhere, in a searchable, accessible, citable form, about how modern institutions actually behave. And it’s gone on to set people free from prison, where documents have been used in their court cases; hold the CIA accountable for renditions programs; feed into election cycles, which have resulted in the termination of, in some case—or contributed to the termination of governments, in some cases, taken the heads of intelligence agencies, ministers of defense and so on. So, you know, our civilization can only be as good as our knowledge of what our civilization is. We can’t possibly hope to reform that which we
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 51194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 72
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.6forum.info

Back to top Go down

Re: ABOUT BENGHAZI

Post  Admin on Thu 29 Jun 2017, 2:51 pm

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/house-republicans-report-sheds-new-light-benghazi-attack-n600121
House Republicans’ Report Sheds New Light on Benghazi Attack
by ANDREA MITCHELL, ALEX MOE, ABIGAIL WILLIAMS and JON SCHUPPE
Play House Republicans Release Long-Awaited Benghazi Report Facebook Twitter Embed
 House Republicans Release Long-Awaited Benghazi Report 2:26
A long-awaited report on the 2012 terrorist attack in Benghazi details an array of bureaucratic miscues and inter-agency blunders but does not specifically blame former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for events that led to the deaths of four Americans.

The 800-page document represents the end of a costly, politically charged investigation led by House Republicans who sought to understand how the attack unfolded, and how the Obama administration — including Clinton — responded. Democrats accused Republicans of using the inquiry to hurt Clinton's chances at the presidency. But after more than two years and an estimated $7 million, the report, released Tuesday, instead paints a more nuanced portrait of incompetence.

Related: Five Takeaways From Clinton's Benghazi Testimony

It details a misunderstanding of America's allies, a mistaken belief that fighting had subsided and breakdowns that delayed the military's attempts to save Americans from the diplomatic compound — including the inability to decide whether Marines should wear their uniforms.

The report also offers new details about why U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens, one of the casualties, was at the compound in the Libyan city with only two State Department bodyguards, months after the British and others had evacuated the area.

NBC News obtained an exclusive look at the first 175-page section of the full 800-page House Select Committee on Benghazi report before the full report was released later Tuesday morning. The Democratic minority released its own report Monday.

Related: Six Takeaways from Benghazi Report

Select Committee on Benghazi Chairman Trey Gowdy, a South Carolina Republican, said in a news conference on Tuesday that the report did not focus on Clinton, but sought a true and complete accounting of the events that led to the four Americans' deaths, and the government's response. He stressed a gaping disconnect between what was happening on the ground in Benghazi and what was happening in Washington.

But other Republican committee members criticized Clinton more directly, accusing her of prioritizing America's relationship with Libya over security at the Benghazi compound, and of trying to spin the attack for political gain. Members Jim Jordan of Ohio and and Mike Pompeo of Kansas wrote their own report, labeled "additional views," focusing on Clinton, accusing her of missing opportunities to protect American lives.

In that sense, the committee’s findings could underscore accusations that the Obama administration — and Clinton’s State Department — were more concerned with public perception than with acting decisively to save American lives.

Play Clinton makes statement on Benghazi report Facebook Twitter Embed
 Clinton makes statement on Benghazi report 2:25
Clinton, speaking at a campaign stop in Denver on Tuesday, said the Benghazi committee's investigations into the attacks and subsequent report "took on a partisan tinge."

"I said this when I testified for 11 hours, that no one has thought more about or lost more sleep over the lives that we lost, the four Americans, which was devastating," she said. "And we owe it, we owe it to those brave Americans to make sure that we learn the right lessons from this tragedy."

"I’ll leave it to others to characterize the report but I think it’s pretty clear it’s time to move on," she said.

Related: Hillary Clinton: 'Time to Move On' After Benghazi Report

White House press secretary Josh Earnest on Tuesday called the Republican-led efforts "political fantasizing."

Public skepticism of Clinton’s trustworthiness continues to dog her presidential campaign, even as she leads Donald Trump overall in national polling. In a NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll released this week, only a quarter of voters judged her to be more honest and straightforward than her GOP rival, while 41 percent favored Trump on questions of trust.

Image: U.S Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, on Sept. 11, 2012
A protester reacts as the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi is seen in flames on September 11, 2012. ESAM OMRAN AL-FETORI / Reuters
One section of the report seems to allege that U.S. officials fundamentally misunderstood who their allies were at the time.

The Republican majority’s report found that 35 Americans were saved not by a “quasi-governmental militia” as previous reports concluded, or even a group the U.S. saw as allies. Instead, the report determines that the Americans were saved by the “Libyan Military Intelligence,” a group composed of military officers under the Moammar Khaddafy regime, the Libyan dictator who the U.S. helped topple just one year earlier.

The February 17 Martyr Brigade, “recommended by the Libyan Government and contractually obligated to provide security to the Mission Compound,” had fled, the report found. “In other words, some of the very individuals the United States helped remove from power during the Libyan revolution were the only Libyans that came to the assistance of the United States on the night of the Benghazi attacks,” the report states.

Read: Benghazi 101

Last fall, Clinton testified before the Benghazi committee that Stevens had originally chosen to serve in Benghazi because “he understood America had to be represented there at that pivotal time." A previous report investigating the attacks did not specify the month Clinton was looking to travel to Libya.

The Republican majority of the committee also found that Stevens traveled to the U.S. mission that week to both fill a temporary staffing gap and to spearhead an effort to make Benghazi a permanent diplomatic post.

Image: J. Christopher Stevens
J. Christopher Stevens, the U.S. Ambassador to Libya, was killed during a 2012 attack on the consulate in Benghazi. U.S. Embassy in Tripoli
Witnesses told the committee Stevens was laying the groundwork for a visit by Clinton just one month later — in October 2012 — and “the hope was to establish a permanent consulate in Benghazi for the Secretary to present to the Libyan government during her trip.”

Discussions were already underway in Washington for how to fund the upgrades, and one month before the end of the fiscal year there was pressure to assemble a package before available funds were lost. The State Department points out that Clinton’s trip had been previously discussed by foreign service officer and former deputy chief of mission in Libya, Gregory Hicks, during his May 2013 public testimony before the House Oversight and Government reform Committee.

Related: Report Drags Clinton Back into Benghazi Mire

The report highlights the military’s failure to carry out Defense Secretary Leon Panetta’s order to deploy forces to Benghazi and the lengthy delay that prevented the military assets from arriving at the embassy in Tripoli until 2 p.m. the day after the Benghazi attack.

“What was disturbing from the evidence the Committee found was that at the time of the final lethal attack at the Annex, no asset ordered deployed by the Secretary had even left the ground,” the report states.

Previous accounts blamed the “tyranny of time and distance” plus the failure to have airplanes ready for the significant delay in moving military assets. But the report states conflicting orders from State Department and Pentagon officials over whether Marines should wear military uniforms or civilian attire also played a role.

Play Watch the White House Respond to the Benghazi Report Facebook Twitter Embed
 Watch the White House Respond to the Benghazi Report 1:16
The State Department argues their agency did not cause any delay.

"We received diplomatic clearance, as is standard, to send a flight into Tripoli to evacuate our personnel. The process of gaining clearance did not delay or cancel any asset going to Libya," said State Department Deputy Spokesperson Mark Toner. "Concerns about what they wore had no bearing on the timing of their arrival.”

In a newly revealed two-hour secure video conference on the night of the attacks led by White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough and attended by Clinton and others, State Department officials raised concerns about the diplomatic sensitivities of the attire to be worn by assets launched.

Image: Hillary Clinton on Oct. 22, 2015
Former Secretary of State and Democratic Presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton testifies before the House Select Committee on Benghazi on October 22, 2015. SAUL LOEB / AFP - Getty Images
In an interview with the Committee, Patrick Kennedy, the under secretary or Management at State, described the department’s sensitivity as wanting to “make sure that the steps we were taking would enhance the security of our personnel, not potentially diminish the security of our personnel.”

According to one commander, the report states, as forces prepared to deploy, “during the course of three hours, he and his Marines changed in and out of their uniforms four times.”

Further, several witnesses told the committee that despite Panetta’s orders, the operating plan was not to insert any asset into Benghazi. “Their understanding was that the assets needed to be sent to Tripoli to augment security at the Embassy, and that the State Department was working to move the State Department personnel from Benghazi to Tripoli.”

Republicans on the committee were critical of high-level officials in Washington for mistakenly thinking that the attacks were over and the crisis had passed by the time the emergency video conference convened, which the report alleges contributed to the confusion.

The report also finds that then-Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral James Winnefeld, did not participate in the secure call because “he had left to return to his residence to host a dinner party for foreign dignitaries.” He received one update during the dinner on the attacks.

Play Clinton on '13 Hours' Movie: 'Yes' Everything Possible Was Done to Save Americans During Benghazi Attack Facebook Twitter Embed
 Clinton on '13 Hours' Movie: 'Yes' Everything Possible Was Done to Save Americans During Benghazi Attack 1:12
The section of the report devoted to the Benghazi assault concludes “the response to the attacks suffered from confusion and miscommunication circulating between agencies.”

Pentagon officials on Tuesday told NBC News that "the department was fully responsive to the committee's investigation, as it has been with numerous previous investigations of the tragedy". The Department of Defense underscored that the timeline of the Benghazi attacks has also long been public as well as military efforts to safely evacuate the Embassy in Tripoli.

"Even though, as the select committee’s chairman has previously acknowledged, it was impossible for the U.S. military to have changed the outcome at Benghazi under the circumstances, the department has made substantial changes to improve our responsiveness based on lessons learned from this incident,"Deputy Pentagon Press Secretary Gordon Trowbridge told NBC News.

A total of 107 witnesses were interviewed for the report, including 81 never before questioned by Congress and 9 eyewitnesses to the attacks, Republicans on the committee told NBC News. The committee also received and reviewed more than 75,000 new pages of documents.

Play Gowdy: There's enough blame to go around Facebook Twitter Embed
 Gowdy: There's enough blame to go around 9:56
Democrats on the House Select Committee on Benghazi had a sharply different view even before seeing the Republicans’ report. The minority version released Monday concludes that "the U.S. military could not have done anything differently on the night of the attacks that would have saved the lives of the four brave Americans killed in Benghazi."

Ranking Member Elijah Cummings early Tuesday called the Republican report "partisan" but could offer no additional comment because "we haven't read it because Republicans didn't want us to check it against the evidence we obtained."‎

Democrats also attacked Republicans over the committee’s process, including what they describe as “grave abuses,” such as excluding Democrats from interviews, concealing exculpatory evidence, withholding interview transcripts, leaking inaccurate information, issuing unilateral subpoenas, sending armed Marshals to the home of a cooperative witness, and even conducting political fundraising “by exploiting the deaths of four Americans.”

Image: U.S. President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton deliver remarks during a transfer ceremony of the remains of U.S. Ambassador to Libya, Chris Stevens and three other Americans killed this week in Benghazi, at Andrews Air Force Base near Washingt
President Barack Obama and then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton deliver remarks during a transfer ceremony of the remains of U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans killed in Benghazi at Andrews Air Force Base on September 14, 2012. Jason Reed / REUTERS, file
The Democrats chastised committee chairman Trey Gowdy ,who they said “personally and publicly accused Secretary Clinton of compromising a highly classified intelligence source."

Democrats did acknowledge, as had been previously determined, that "security measures in Benghazi were woefully inadequate as a result of decisions made by officials in the Bureau of Diplomatic Security.” But their report concluded, “Secretary Clinton never personally denied any requests for additional security in Benghazi.”

Reacting to the GOP report early Tuesday, Toner, the State Department deputy spokesman, said: "We have made great progress towards making our posts safer since 2012. We have been working to respond to the extensive findings and recommendations of the independent Accountability Review Board, closing out 26 out of its 29 recommendations."

Play New questions arise after Benghazi report Facebook Twitter Embed
 New questions arise after Benghazi report 2:34
A Select Committee spokesman dismissed the Democrats’ report as “rehashed, partisan talking points” aimed at defending Hillary Clinton.

Appearing on Morning Joe on Tuesday, Gowdy dismissed Democrats' charge that the report targeted Clinton for political reasons rather than investigating the reasons for the loss of American lives in the attack.

"They will be shocked when they read the report, if they do bother to read the report," Gowdy said. "It is a series of heroic acts by our fellow Americans and what we can do to prevent the next [attack.]"

"Yes, Hillary Clinton was secretary of state at the time," he added. "I can't get around that fact, but the focus of this report is on exactly what the families asked us to focus on."

A senior White House officials told NBC News on Tuesday that the report released by the Republican majority on the committee "has been a right-wing conspiracy theory for years now — and has been debunked several times over, including by Republican reports and investigations."
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 51194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 72
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.6forum.info

Back to top Go down

Re: ABOUT BENGHAZI

Post  Admin on Sat 03 Jun 2017, 1:06 pm

This came up in my Facebook memories and worth bring. I remember Bowe was said couldn't speak to his family he had forgotten English. I cannot understand this as British Terry Waite was captured and imprisoned and he had no problem speaking immediately. 
http://wonkette.com/550518/allen-west-pretty-sure-bowe-bergdahls-dad-made-the-white-house-a-mosque#Vd1dT5JiqzjQAI5i.01

Extract from this article: “What none of these media is reporting is that the father’s (SGT Bowe Bergdahl’s father Bob) first words at the WH were in Arabic – those words were “bism allah alrahman alraheem” – which means “in the name of Allah the most gracious and most merciful” – these are the opening words of every chapter of the Qur’an except one (the chapter of the sword – the 9th) – by uttering these words on the grounds of the WH, Bergdahl (the father) sanctified the WH and claimed it for Islam. There is no question but POTUS knows this.”
leave no soldier behind...unless obama hugs his dad
Allen West Pretty Sure Bowe Bergdahl’s Dad Made The White House A Mosque

By Doktor Zoom -  June 2, 2014 - 1:27pm 0
SHARE Facebook Twitter  
Flip
image: https://img.wonkette.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/WH-mosque.jpg
You'd be surprised how many similar pics are out there. Then again, maybe you wouldn't.OMG you guys! Disgraced former torturer Allen West, super-patriot and Muslim-Hunter extraordinaire, has been tipped off to some earth-shattering proof of Muslim perfidy and scary creeping — or galloping! — sharia law! After spending the weekend calling Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl a “deserter” and hinting that there’s something “nefarious” about his release from the Taliban, and about Bergdahl’s father, Bob Bergdahl (who apparently doesn’t hate Muslims enough at all), West has revealed a “bombshell”: Bob Bergdahl spoke Arabic at the White House! Not only that, but he pretty much made the White House a holy Muslim shrine by doing that, according to a very smart person who emailed Allen West.

West says that he got an email from Clare Lopez, a “former CIA operations officer” who knows all sorts of stuff about Islam and the Middle East, and who is a personal friend of one Allen West. Lopez completely blows the lid off a huge cover-up, he says!

SHE EMAILED ME THIS MORNING A VERY POIGNANT ANALYSIS THAT ONLY SOMEONE KNOWING LANGUAGE AND ISLAM COULD ASCERTAIN. SHE WROTE:

“WHAT NONE OF THESE MEDIA IS REPORTING IS THAT THE FATHER’S (SGT BOWE BERGDAHL’S FATHER BOB) FIRST WORDS AT THE WH WERE IN ARABIC – THOSE WORDS WERE “BISM ALLAH ALRAHMAN ALRAHEEM” – WHICH MEANS “IN THE NAME OF ALLAH THE MOST GRACIOUS AND MOST MERCIFUL” – THESE ARE THE OPENING WORDS OF EVERY CHAPTER OF THE QUR’AN EXCEPT ONE (THE CHAPTER OF THE SWORD – THE 9TH) – BY UTTERING THESE WORDS ON THE GROUNDS OF THE WH, BERGDAHL (THE FATHER) SANCTIFIED THE WH AND CLAIMED IT FOR ISLAM. THERE IS NO QUESTION BUT POTUS KNOWS THIS.”

FOLKS, THERE IS A LOT TO THIS WHOLE EPISODE — LIKE BENGHAZI — THAT WE MAY NEVER KNOW. AND THIS IS NOT CONSPIRACY THEORY, IT IS TRUTH BASED UPON ARABIC AND ISLAMIC DOGMA AND TRADITION.

Is America going to continue to let Barack Hussein Obama invite parents of rescued POWs to the White House and claim it for Islam? This is not a conspiracy theory, this is genuine honest-to-god disloyalty to America. Or maybe — and we’re going to go out on a limb here — it’s a routine phrase in Muslim Prayer that doesn’t actually have any magical power whatsoever, except perhaps the power to freak out wingnuts.

Get ready for a lot more of this idiocy, folks; somehow, the fact that Bowe Bergdahl’s dad is sympathetic to Muslims has also been Very Big with the Stupidest Man on the Internet. Here’s how terrifying Bob Bergdahl is: He said a phrase in Arabic, and then OBAMA HUGGED HIM! That just doesn’t wash off, you know.

Be afraid. Be very afraid. And while you’re at it, maybe you should buy some more guns.

[Allen West / Gateway Pundit]

Read more at https://wonkette.com/550518/allen-west-pretty-sure-bowe-bergdahls-dad-made-the-white-house-a-mosque#3QlXH4bFBX2qCgzb.99
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 51194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 72
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.6forum.info

Back to top Go down

Re: ABOUT BENGHAZI

Post  Admin on Tue 23 May 2017, 3:42 pm

One Constitutional expert believes that this is a clear and historical example of presidential treason.
http://www.jewsnews.co.il/2016/02/17/three-of-five-detainees-swapped-for-bowe-bergdahl-are-now-isis-leaders.html
Three of Five Detainees Swapped For Bowe Bergdahl Are Now ISIS Leaders
FEB 17, 2016by ADMINin DIASPORA
via Political Ears: Remember when Obama committed treason by bypassing Congress and swapping five high-value detainees for one American traitor?
Remember the speech Obama gave last week telling Americans that we must take on ISIS?

Put together the two and you have a case for charges of treason against Barack Hussein Obama.

It is being reported that at least 3 of the 5 detainees involved in the swap have joined ISIS in Syria and Iraq as commanders and are using that rank to usher in an “Islamic Caliphate” (a Sunni Islamic Theocracy – contrary to Obama’s claims that ISIS is not Islamic).

The “Taliban 5” who were transferred from Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to custody in Doha, Qatar, are Mohammad Fazl, Khairullah Khairkhwa, Abdul Haq Wasiq, Norullah Noori, and Mohammad Nabi Omari. They have largely disappeared from view since they were dropped off in Doha, but eyewitnesses place Fazi, Wasiq, and Noori in Iraq and Syria fighting with ISIS.

This confirms our worst fears when the swap took place.

One Constitutional expert believes that this is a clear and historical example of presidential treason.

“Article 2 of the Constitution clearly states that treason
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 51194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 72
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.6forum.info

Back to top Go down

Re: ABOUT BENGHAZI

Post  Admin on Tue 23 May 2017, 3:16 pm

One Constitutional expert believes that this is a clear and historical example of presidential treason.
http://www.jewsnews.co.il/2016/02/17/three-of-five-detainees-swapped-for-bowe-bergdahl-are-now-isis-leaders.html
Three of Five Detainees Swapped For Bowe Bergdahl Are Now ISIS Leaders
FEB 17, 2016by ADMINin DIASPORA
via Political Ears: Remember when Obama committed treason by bypassing Congress and swapping five high-value detainees for one American traitor?
Remember the speech Obama gave last week telling Americans that we must take on ISIS?

Put together the two and you have a case for charges of treason against Barack Hussein Obama.

It is being reported that at least 3 of the 5 detainees involved in the swap have joined ISIS in Syria and Iraq as commanders and are using that rank to usher in an “Islamic Caliphate” (a Sunni Islamic Theocracy – contrary to Obama’s claims that ISIS is not Islamic).

The “Taliban 5” who were transferred from Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to custody in Doha, Qatar, are Mohammad Fazl, Khairullah Khairkhwa, Abdul Haq Wasiq, Norullah Noori, and Mohammad Nabi Omari. They have largely disappeared from view since they were dropped off in Doha, but eyewitnesses place Fazi, Wasiq, and Noori in Iraq and Syria fighting with ISIS.

This confirms our worst fears when the swap took place.

One Constitutional expert believes that this is a clear and historical example of presidential treason.

“Article 2 of the Constitution clearly states that treason
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 51194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 72
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.6forum.info

Back to top Go down

Re: ABOUT BENGHAZI

Post  Admin on Sat 20 May 2017, 11:28 am

http://dailycaller.com/2015/05/19/its-now-clear-the-stunning-negligence-that-led-up-to-chris-stevens-death-in-benghazi/
It’s Now Clear The Stunning Negligence That Led Up To Chris Stevens’ Death In Benghazi
GEOFFREY INGERSOLL
11:14 PM 05/19/2015
7417854 7417854 Share    
Two smoking guns hit the news streams this week: The U.S. indeed had a gun-running program pipelining Libyan weapons to Syrian rebels through a port in Benghazi; and at least some “intelligence” on action in Libya passed through not one, but at least two of Hillary Clinton’s “homebrew” email addresses.

It’s Clinton’s reliance on her civilian email servers for seemingly classified communications (indeed, all Department of State communications), coupled with the real nature of the mission in Benghazi, that lay bare the negligence leading up to the attack that took the lives of four Americans, including Ambassador Chris Stevens and two former Navy SEALs.

In the November following the attack, The Wall Street Journal reported that the U.S. mission in Benghazi was “at its heart, a CIA operation.” It turns out the CIA Annex that had its cover blown during the attack was more than likely the central hub of an international gun running operation.

A source told Fox News two weeks after the attack that Stevens was in Benghazi meeting a Turkish diplomat to “negotiate a weapons transfer, in an effort to get SA-7 missiles out of the hands of violent extremists.” One hour after Stevens showed him the door, local Libyan guards “abandoned their posts” and the assault began.

 
Sponsored Links by
We know that Moammar Gadhafi’s stockpile of SA-7 man-portable surface-to-air missiles concerned Western intelligence agencies, so much so that they quickly set up programs to locate and supposedly destroy these weapons in Libya. We also know that these weapons had, since Gadhafi’s fall, appeared in Mali in the hands of members of al-Qaida in the Islamic Meghreb through somewhat shady weapons deals.

So the alleged purpose of the CIA Annex was to rob extremist Peter of his heavy weapons and deliver the weapons to Syrian rebel Paul, putting the agency in direct competition with the same militia that attacked the consulate.

Perhaps coincidentally, some of the concern about the SA-7 market came through in emails to Clinton from Sidney Blumenthal. We already know how easily hackers scooped his information.

What we don’t know is to what degree Clinton discussed the Benghazi mission’s plans over unsecured lines on her private email. The lead of Michael Schmidt’s report in The New York Times says Clinton “exclusively used a personal email account to conduct government business as secretary of state.”

That would certainly indicate there might be some exposure.

Of course, the State Department’s email is not without its holes. Neither is the White House’s network. Nevertheless, Clinton, unlike Colin Powell, who used civilian email for minor “housekeeping,” clearly peddled the type of intelligence that she herself deemed actionable.

“FYI,” she writes to Jake Sullivan, her well regarded deputy chief of staff, on a forwarded Blumenthal memo, “The idea of using private security contractors to arm the opposition should be considered.”

The importance of talking government talk over government lines is accountability. No one knows if Clinton’s emails were hacked, and no one knows exactly what information she passed over that server.

Just as a source at the State Department told me following the attack, “We need to look real hard at who knew Stevens was going to be there [at that mission in Benghazi].”

Without a detailed, unadulterated analysis of Clinton’s email server, we have no idea what kind of information was compromised.

Christopher Budd, a 10-year veteran at Microsoft Security Response Center who now works at Trend Micro, wrote of Clinton’s email use that “You can liken this to the CFO of Chase taking billions of dollars in cash home and storing it in the mattress. It’s so inadequate to meeting the risks that it would be laughable if it weren’t so serious.”

And finally, an editor at Red State about summed it up when he tweeted, “Don’t worry, despite Hillary Clinton’s grossly negligent email security practices, nobody’d actually try to hack us,” dropping a link to news of the President Barack Obama’s compromised email over unclassified networks.

The difference is that federal techies can forensically dissect the White House’s hack to at least have some idea who was behind it and what their intentions were (Russia, intentions clear). We can’t even do that with Clinton’s emails.

Perhaps the Justice Department needs reminding that this kind of negligence bracketed the loss of life on Sept. 11, 2012.

Tags: Benghazi, Chris Stevens, Hillary Clinton, Libya, Syria
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 51194
Join date : 2008-10-25
Age : 72
Location : Wales UK

View user profile http://worldwidechristians.6forum.info

Back to top Go down

Re: ABOUT BENGHAZI

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 1 of 2 1, 2  Next

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum